Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator

@bmeneg bmeneg commented Feb 22, 2022

In order to make the README information more clear this patch overhaul
its structure and update its content to match the current state of the
tool.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Meneguele [email protected]

Fix #777 .
This PR semantically depends on PR #809 being merged, otherwise some recommendations won't work as expected.

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmeneg commented Feb 22, 2022

@zaquestion once PR #809 and this one here are merged, could you update the project "About" text dropping the "Lab wraps Git and Hub" part? I don't have permission to do so.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #811 (3371ecd) into master (f8ed118) will increase coverage by 0.80%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #811      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.43%   56.24%   +0.80%     
==========================================
  Files          77       77              
  Lines        5771     5752      -19     
==========================================
+ Hits         3199     3235      +36     
+ Misses       2277     2227      -50     
+ Partials      295      290       -5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cmd/clone.go 71.87% <0.00%> (-2.20%) ⬇️
cmd/issue.go 68.18% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/mr_checkout.go 81.96% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/fork.go 63.15% <0.00%> (+5.26%) ⬆️
cmd/root.go 63.52% <0.00%> (+5.73%) ⬆️
cmd/mr_discussion.go 85.07% <0.00%> (+28.35%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 54a8737...3371ecd. Read the comment docs.

@zaquestion
Copy link
Owner

Might be worth adding a table of contents while you're at it, Readme has gotta a lot longer since the early days

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmeneg commented Feb 22, 2022

Oh, sure, I'll add the toc :)

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmeneg commented Feb 23, 2022

@zaquestion I just realized that GitHub itself has a table of contents in the left of readme's filename:
image

It was released mid last year. With that I think we don't really need to have a specific toc in our doc.

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmeneg commented Feb 23, 2022

Lol.. I'm pretty sure a README file change don't affect a build testing:

409 {message: {base: [PG::QueryCanceled: ERROR:  canceling statement due to statement timeout

And I'm almost sure it's not client's problem (error 40x) .. hahaha.

@zampierilucas
Copy link
Collaborator

@zaquestion I just realized that GitHub itself has a table of contents in the left of readme's filename: image

It was released mid last year. With that I think we don't really need to have a specific toc in our doc.

Does GitLab support that? If not, It's not worth the work IMO, as we are moving soon™ to GitLab.

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmeneg commented Feb 23, 2022

GitLab requires an explicit toc with [[_TOC_]].
Since it's different for github we can change it once we migrate to GitLab.

@zaquestion
Copy link
Owner

@zaquestion once PR #809 and this one here are merged, could you update the project "About" text dropping the "Lab wraps Git and Hub" part? I don't have permission to do so.

Can do, feel free to email me if I forget / fail to notice this merge.

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmeneg commented Feb 24, 2022

@zaquestion once PR #809 and this one here are merged, could you update the project "About" text dropping the "Lab wraps Git and Hub" part? I don't have permission to do so.

Can do, feel free to email me if I forget / fail to notice this merge.

:-) ack! Will do.

In order to make the README information more clear this patch overhaul
its structure and update its content to match the current state of the
tool.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Meneguele <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@prarit prarit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@bmeneg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bmeneg commented Mar 2, 2022

@zaquestion, just fyi.. you can now update project's description. I'm hitting the merge button right now.

@bmeneg bmeneg merged commit e440337 into zaquestion:master Mar 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

About text should be updated to remove reference to usage as a wrapper

4 participants