Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Expand syntax package to cover ZIO #1481

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2019
Merged

Expand syntax package to cover ZIO #1481

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2019

Conversation

@NeQuissimus
Copy link
Member

  • Syntax now available with ZIO rather than IO
  • Changed ZIO.require to return ZIO, not IO
  • Fixed type parameters on RIO.require

Fixes #1445

@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus requested review from iravid and jdegoes August 25, 2019 14:50
jdegoes
jdegoes reviewed Aug 25, 2019
View reviewed changes
jdegoes
jdegoes requested changes Aug 25, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jdegoes jdegoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a quick change, then looks good to merge!

@NeQuissimus
Expand syntax package to cover ZIO
591f2b2 
- Syntax now available with ZIO rather than IO
- Changed ZIO.require to return ZIO, not IO
- Fixed type parameters on RIO.require

Fixes zio#1445
@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus requested a review from jdegoes August 25, 2019 16:05
jdegoes
jdegoes approved these changes Aug 25, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jdegoes jdegoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus merged commit 52a48fd into zio:master Aug 25, 2019
@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus deleted the zio-syntax branch August 26, 2019 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jdegoes jdegoes jdegoes approved these changes

@iravid iravid Awaiting requested review from iravid

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Question: Why is syntax for IO

2 participants

@NeQuissimus @jdegoes