-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.4k
WIP cats-effect Concurrent instance #267
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jdegoes
merged 22 commits into
zio:master
from
neko-kai:feature/cats-effect-1.0.0-concurrent
Dec 3, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
22 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3b001fa
Try cats-effect-1.0.0 Concurrent ConcurrentEffect
neko-kai a37d4f9
Almost fix racePair to adhere to cats-effect laws, isolate cases that…
neko-kai 890c0bb
Update to latest changes in ZIO
neko-kai 71695e1
ConcurrentEffect tests
neko-kai 348dec1
Include stub of ConcurrentEffect
neko-kai 7ef4629
Make ioContextShift a global instance wrt RTS
neko-kai 586e8ad
update to latest changes
neko-kai 219eb0c
fmt
neko-kai 7b4571b
remove asyncFRegisterCanBeCancelled override as it was fixed
neko-kai e2ed60e
Override asyncCancelableReceivesCancelSignal
neko-kai 32918d9
Run Concurrent tests 50 times
neko-kai e13d242
Override cancelOnBracketReleases with zio version, simplify racePair
neko-kai ffa8680
cleanup: remove printlns, remove cats laws overrides
neko-kai 6c66774
cleanup: Remove non-working ConcurrentEffect stub
neko-kai 62c39b2
cleanup: depend on cats-effect-1.0.0 outside of laws, fmt
neko-kai b10d51e
override defaultHandler to reduce stdout noize
neko-kai ccf36ce
remove erroneous test, remove upTo
neko-kai 3a3c160
Fix #348 Add cats-effecty race. fix tests
neko-kai d2e59e6
bring back deleted tests
neko-kai c994871
address review
neko-kai 72af143
Remove raceAttempt
neko-kai 3fe5fae
Merge branch 'master' into feature/cats-effect-1.0.0-concurrent
neko-kai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need to run those 50 times anymore, do we?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hopefully we don't. But, these tests are cheap enough to run and each iteration gives a slightly higher chance of spotting a regression. I know this is a defensive code smell, but IMHO justified by the domain - these are effectively integration tests, that also highly depend on JVM behavior and on upstream cats-effect.