Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the ways in which Swedish seventh grade students (12 and 13 years old) handle chance encounters. Four groups of students working in pairs participated in the study. In the group discussions, which were tape-recorded and fully transcribed, the students were encouraged to explore strategies for winning a specifically designed dice game based on the sum of two dice. The dice game included four different set-ups of dice designed to bring to the fore different aspects of probability modelling and to offer the student the opportunity to encounter small differences in the mathematical structure of the sample space and of the probability distribution between the four different set-ups. The study describes strategies that the students use when confronted with these different set-ups, what their activities imply in terms of resources in handling random phenomena and what the dice game offers in terms of opportunities for learning probability. In order to explain such meaning-making processes the students’ activities are viewed from a perspective that takes into consideration how the students’ understanding varies with their interpretations of the situation they are confronted with, i.e., how they contextualize the different set-ups of the dice game. The results show how the students, during the course of the game, reorganize their interpretations of the mathematical content confronting them, and how a variation of guiding principles becomes the object of exploration. Approaches of extremes and a number model are described as a means for the students to identify and assign probabilities for the total of two dice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruner, J. S. (1968). Towards a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89–111.
Casscells, W., Schoenberger, A., & Graboys, T. B. (1978). Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 999–1001.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.
Fischbein, E., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1991). Factors affecting probabilistic judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 523–549.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.) (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halldén, O. (1988). Alternative frameworks and the concept of task. Cognitive constraints in students’ interpretations of teachers’ assignments. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 123–140.
Halldén, O. (1999). Conceptual change and contextualisation. In W. Schnotz, M. Carretero & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 53–65). London: Elsevier.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 493–508). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keeler, C., & Steinhorst, K. (2001). A new approach to learning probability in the first statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 9, 1–23.
Keren, G. (1984). On the importance of identifying the correct sample space. Cognition, 16, 121–128.
Lecoutre, M. P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in ‘Purely Random’ situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557–568.
Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Polaki, M. V. (2005). Dealing with compound events. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 191–214). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602–625.
Pratt, D., & Noss, R. (2002). The micro-evolution of mathematical knowledge: The case of randomness. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 453–488.
Ryve, A. (2006). Making explicit the analysis of students’ mathematical discourses – Revisiting a newly developed methodological framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 191–210.
Scheja, M. (2002). Contextualising studies in higher education – First-year experiences of studying and learning in engineering. PhD thesis, Department of Education, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Shaughnessy, M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: Macmillan.
Speiser, R., & Walter, C. (1998) Two dice, two sample spaces. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. Seu Kea, T. Wee Kee & W.-K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Vol. 1 (pp. 67–73). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute Permanent Office.
Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–167). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Säljö, R. (1991). Learning and mediation – Fitting reality into a table. Learning and Instruction, 1, 261–272.
Tiberghien, A. (1994). Modeling as a basis for analyzing teaching–learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 4, 71–87.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
Vidakovic, D., Berenson, S., & Brandsma, J. (1998). Children’s intuition of probabilistic concepts emerging from fair play. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. Seu Kea, T. Wee Kee & W.-K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Vol. 1 (pp. 67–73). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute Permanent Office.
von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Watson, J. (2005). The probabilistic reasoning of middle school students. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 145–169). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Wistedt, I., & Brattström, G. (2004). Mathematical induction in a cooperative setting. Merits and limitations of classroom communication among peers. In A. Chronaki & M. Christiansen (Eds.), Challenging ways of viewing classroom communication. Greenwich, UK: Information Age.
Wistedt, I., Brattström, G., & Jacobsson, C. (1983). Att använda barns informella kunskaper I matematikundervisningen [Using children’s informal knowledge in mathematics education]. Stochholms universitet: Pedagogiska institutionen.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Inger Wistedt, Håkan Sollervall, Lennart Hellström and Andreas Ryve for providing valuable feedback on previous versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, P. Different ways in which students handle chance encounters in the explorative setting of a dice game. Educ Stud Math 66, 293–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9062-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9062-0