B Schuck

I forwarded this message as a test to [email protected] and it was accepted and processed as expected. Thank you. Bruce S. On 5/28/24 10:20 AM, SourceForge Support wrote: Hello, Is this still an issue? Our team has been working on your report, and we would like to have your feedback. Sincerely, SourceForge Support [site-support:#25828] https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/25828/ List eMail being Rejected Status: open Created: Tue May 28, 2024 02:17 AM UTC by B Schuck...

Looking at other current tickets I see that others are reporting the same (or at least similar) issue. Tickets 25825, 25824, 25823, and 25822 (and my ticket 25828) all report issues sending email to SourceForge hosted email lists.

List eMail being Rejected

While F::Q is being actively maintained, development moved to https://github.com/finance-quote/finance-quote some years back.

Sorry, but your code is using Finance::QuoteHist. This is the SourceForge project site for Finance::Quote, which is an entirely different module. See the Finance::QuoteHist module's README file for information on reporting bugs and issues.

Thank you for your response Martin. There has been recent work done in preparation for releasing v1.50. This included attempting to identify those modules that are no longer working. Some of those have been updated, while some have been removed. In testing v1.50, I was able to get data for GB00B4XB7L79 from the FTFunds.pm module. Odd, since it was not one of the modules updated. I would like to update the test file, since most of the funds used as test cases are no longer valid. - Bruce S

Funds can tricky to get quotes for. While taking a quick look at this, the FT Funds module in Finance::Quote has not been modified since 2010 and likely needs to be updated. For instance to get the data from markets.ft.com, the suffix :GBP needs to be appended to the ISIN for this fund. Suggest you go to https://github.com/finance-quote/finance-quote and open an issue. We are getting ready to release Finance::Quote v1.50, but this may be an easy enough fix to be included in v1.51.

Command vs Library