Null Terra
Kissaki, [email protected]
Instance: programming.dev
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 33
Comments: 209
Posts and Comments by Kissaki, [email protected]
Kissaki
c/programming
c/gamedev
c/rust
Comments by Kissaki, [email protected]
nice cigar
A relatively uncommon but reasonable, good approach to issue management.
Discussions allow for different formats, including explicit voting, which is useful for things like feature requests.
Video shows them opening the hackaday website and pressing “accept all” on the “share and sell personal data with and to third parties” dialog. 🙈
Just gotta close it off on both ends<===>
(parens for round ends didn't look good)
Opensource@programming.dev
Looks like they're planning to integrate voctoweb into the Fediverse.
I don't get what your bridge example is supposed to show, nor what normalizing substandard practice has to do with politics or lack thereof.
Depending on where you look there's plenty of shoddy construction work and cutting corners for cost, big projects are notorious for taking longer and costing more in the end. Construction had more time to develop and be regulated, and has more physical limitations compared to software development. Both, in the end, can be (theoretically) held accountable before court.
is to be able to communicate this effectively with management
Isn't this politics? Why are you saying politics has no place in engineering principles?
Software engineers are much more replaceable than construction engineers/architects, both in-discipline and with less expertise.
I do my part in what I can influence and control, delivering good and sound products, but it's obvious depending on individuality doesn't work across our whole industry.
/edit: The linked article talks about how in-company politics are necessary to coordinate and deliver features. I don't see that addressed here either? How would you deliver - taking the example from the article - Latex in Markdown on GitHub without politics?
I worked on and created a lot of things, but when thinking 'cool', the fractal rendering I did a long time ago popped into my mind as well. It just looks cool, interesting, has variance and experimentation, and is very visual.
The author provided no evidence of it
They're contextualizing and sourcing it plenty. It's their impression from their experience, from their years of being in that field. In the later adding of comments at the end they go into different takes as well, reiterating that it's what they saw or see in [their] big corp[s] [and those he talks to].
You're saying people are rotating too often - which was one of their points. Not sure if you meant support that point or point it out [assuming they didn't].
Sharing, because I had to look up Abstract Wikipedia
Abstract Wikipedia is an in-development project of the Wikimedia Foundation. It aims to use Wikifunctions to create a language-independent version of Wikipedia using its structured data.
Microsoft actually cut off Israel’s access to Azure…
After months of pressure and trying to silence internal criticism.
I had to look it up to make sure "months of" is correct. Wikipedia has the infos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft#Israeli_military_support 2023-2025, various employees fired
“Microsoft actually cut off Israel’s access to Azure” doesn't really cover or adequately represent their behavior regarding this topic.
That comment doesn't say anything about what I'm asking about here.
Probably in some AI training data sets. Not that those are particularly good backups.
maybe they also mean Israel/Gaza or the AI push
… Gitlab though; the only difference is you see more “a large premium customer is requesting this” comments!
I love those! /s 😄 It can certainly feel like a pattern, specifically for some tickets.
YouTube recently introduced UI changes. Google probably didn't optimize for Firefox besides Chrome. Whatever they're doing, it may be more performance on Chrome than on Firefox for technical reasons.
As a quality metric, "bad company". If you can differentiate between hardware product and drivers, you can separate those metrics. But usually, and for most people, using the product also means using their drivers.
You can just take the L and say you didn’t see that the function definition that was “added” was just “removed” at the top.
That's not what happened though.
Changing the indent of the def changes the definition. That's my whole argument.
I don't get why you say "of course", agreeing with my point, but then "it was only the indentation that was changed".
Do you have a comparison to other tools like Grammarly? Were you sometimes missing suggestions or linting rules?
as an open-source alternative to Grammarly
intentionally avoids including any kind of generative AI in any part of our processing pipeline
Isn't that what Grammarly is all about, though? Be better than traditional spellchecking through LLM?
I assume Harper is entirely Rules based, then? Which inherently means limited to what rules where introduced manually and what the rules cover.
New hardware manufacturer quality metric: Number of frustrated user pledges per time since market introduction.
nice cigar
A relatively uncommon but reasonable, good approach to issue management.
Discussions allow for different formats, including explicit voting, which is useful for things like feature requests.
Why users cannot create Issues directly – ghostty (github.com)
Users are not allowed to create Issues directly in this repository - we ask that you create a Discussion first.
Video shows them opening the hackaday website and pressing “accept all” on the “share and sell personal data with and to third parties” dialog. 🙈
Just gotta close it off on both ends
<===>(parens for round ends didn't look good)
Looks like they're planning to integrate voctoweb into the Fediverse.
I don't get what your bridge example is supposed to show, nor what normalizing substandard practice has to do with politics or lack thereof.
Depending on where you look there's plenty of shoddy construction work and cutting corners for cost, big projects are notorious for taking longer and costing more in the end. Construction had more time to develop and be regulated, and has more physical limitations compared to software development. Both, in the end, can be (theoretically) held accountable before court.
Isn't this politics? Why are you saying politics has no place in engineering principles?
Software engineers are much more replaceable than construction engineers/architects, both in-discipline and with less expertise.
I do my part in what I can influence and control, delivering good and sound products, but it's obvious depending on individuality doesn't work across our whole industry.
/edit: The linked article talks about how in-company politics are necessary to coordinate and deliver features. I don't see that addressed here either? How would you deliver - taking the example from the article - Latex in Markdown on GitHub without politics?
Coming soon: Simpler pricing and a better experience for GitHub Actions - GitHub Changelog (Adds self-hosted runner cost) (github.blog)
On January 1, 2026, GitHub will reduce the price of GitHub-hosted runners by up to 39% depending on the machine type used. The free usage minute quotas will remain the same.
I worked on and created a lot of things, but when thinking 'cool', the fractal rendering I did a long time ago popped into my mind as well. It just looks cool, interesting, has variance and experimentation, and is very visual.
They're contextualizing and sourcing it plenty. It's their impression from their experience, from their years of being in that field. In the later adding of comments at the end they go into different takes as well, reiterating that it's what they saw or see in [their] big corp[s] [and those he talks to].
You're saying people are rotating too often - which was one of their points. Not sure if you meant support that point or point it out [assuming they didn't].
Sharing, because I had to look up Abstract Wikipedia
After months of pressure and trying to silence internal criticism.
I had to look it up to make sure "months of" is correct. Wikipedia has the infos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft#Israeli_military_support 2023-2025, various employees fired
“Microsoft actually cut off Israel’s access to Azure” doesn't really cover or adequately represent their behavior regarding this topic.
That comment doesn't say anything about what I'm asking about here.
Probably in some AI training data sets. Not that those are particularly good backups.
maybe they also mean Israel/Gaza or the AI push
I love those! /s 😄 It can certainly feel like a pattern, specifically for some tickets.
Preserving code that shaped generations: Zork I, II, and III go Open Source (opensource.microsoft.com)
When Zork arrived, it didn’t just ask players to win; it asked them to imagine. There were no graphics, no joystick, and no soundtrack, only words on a screen and the player’s curiosity. Yet those words built worlds more vivid than most games of their time. What made that possible wasn’t just clever writing, it was clever engineering.
YouTube recently introduced UI changes. Google probably didn't optimize for Firefox besides Chrome. Whatever they're doing, it may be more performance on Chrome than on Firefox for technical reasons.
As a quality metric, "bad company". If you can differentiate between hardware product and drivers, you can separate those metrics. But usually, and for most people, using the product also means using their drivers.
That's not what happened though.
Changing the indent of the def changes the definition. That's my whole argument.
I don't get why you say "of course", agreeing with my point, but then "it was only the indentation that was changed".