Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@saschadoemer
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@Frank-Wiebeler Frank-Wiebeler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the technical view: Really awesome job.
The comments and requests for change ask for changes in the Commented parts of the code.
The function and attribute naming in the library looks quite obvious, so I'm not really sure if we should add all those function header comments that might not reflect any changes in the future but might lead to misconceptions due to copy&paste. Additionally, some comments only repeat the attribute names. Like "sendMessage(SendMessageParameters parameters); comment: @param parameters Parameters to send messages" does not provide any extra information.

oliverrahner
oliverrahner previously approved these changes Feb 18, 2021
String send(T parameters);

/**
* Send a asynchronous message.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

an

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Copy link
Member

@Frank-Wiebeler Frank-Wiebeler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job.

Copy link
Member

@Frank-Wiebeler Frank-Wiebeler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job 🥇

@Frank-Wiebeler Frank-Wiebeler merged commit 63435e8 into develop Mar 11, 2021
@saschadoemer saschadoemer deleted the feature/asynchronous_message_sending branch March 13, 2021 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants