Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

juan-fernandez
Copy link
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

  • Do not run happy-dom integration tests for node 18.
  • Remove happy-dom plugin tests.

Motivation

happy-dom released a breaking change for >=19: https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/releases/tag/v19.0.0.

Node 18 is no longer supported for CJS.

Additionally, I've removed the plugin tests for happy-dom: these tests do not reflect the way the library is used and shouldn't have been updated in #6208. These tests should be considered legacy and should eventually be removed.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Overall package size

Self size: 12.51 MB
Deduped: 112.73 MB
No deduping: 113.13 MB

Dependency sizes | name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | @datadog/libdatadog | 0.7.0 | 35.02 MB | 35.02 MB | | @datadog/native-appsec | 10.2.1 | 20.64 MB | 20.65 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking | 4.0.0 | 11.72 MB | 11.73 MB | | @datadog/pprof | 5.10.0 | 9.91 MB | 10.3 MB | | @opentelemetry/core | 1.30.1 | 908.66 kB | 7.16 MB | | protobufjs | 7.5.4 | 2.95 MB | 5.73 MB | | @datadog/wasm-js-rewriter | 4.0.1 | 2.85 MB | 3.58 MB | | @datadog/native-metrics | 3.1.1 | 1.02 MB | 1.43 MB | | @opentelemetry/api | 1.9.0 | 1.22 MB | 1.22 MB | | jsonpath-plus | 10.3.0 | 617.18 kB | 1.08 MB | | import-in-the-middle | 1.14.4 | 123.18 kB | 851.76 kB | | lru-cache | 10.4.3 | 804.3 kB | 804.3 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | source-map | 0.7.6 | 185.63 kB | 185.63 kB | | pprof-format | 2.2.1 | 163.06 kB | 163.06 kB | | @datadog/sketches-js | 2.1.1 | 109.9 kB | 109.9 kB | | lodash.sortby | 4.7.0 | 75.76 kB | 75.76 kB | | ignore | 7.0.5 | 63.38 kB | 63.38 kB | | istanbul-lib-coverage | 3.2.2 | 34.37 kB | 34.37 kB | | rfdc | 1.4.1 | 27.15 kB | 27.15 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.10 | 26.73 kB | 26.73 kB | | @isaacs/ttlcache | 1.4.1 | 25.2 kB | 25.2 kB | | tlhunter-sorted-set | 0.1.0 | 24.94 kB | 24.94 kB | | shell-quote | 1.8.3 | 23.74 kB | 23.74 kB | | limiter | 1.1.5 | 23.17 kB | 23.17 kB | | retry | 0.13.1 | 18.85 kB | 18.85 kB | | semifies | 1.0.0 | 15.84 kB | 15.84 kB | | jest-docblock | 29.7.0 | 8.99 kB | 12.76 kB | | crypto-randomuuid | 1.0.0 | 11.18 kB | 11.18 kB | | ttl-set | 1.0.0 | 4.61 kB | 9.69 kB | | mutexify | 1.4.0 | 5.71 kB | 8.74 kB | | path-to-regexp | 0.1.12 | 6.6 kB | 6.6 kB | | module-details-from-path | 1.0.4 | 3.96 kB | 3.96 kB |

🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe

@juan-fernandez juan-fernandez marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2025 12:17
@juan-fernandez juan-fernandez requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2025 12:17
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.90%. Comparing base (bae4e64) to head (0dd1996).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6566   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.90%   83.90%           
=======================================
  Files         485      485           
  Lines       20337    20343    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        17063    17069    +6     
  Misses       3274     3274           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@juan-fernandez juan-fernandez changed the title [test optimization] Test happy-dom testing issues with latest jest release [test optimization] Fix happy-dom testing issues with latest jest release Sep 30, 2025
calvinbayer
calvinbayer previously approved these changes Sep 30, 2025
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-10-02 08:06:42

Comparing candidate commit 0dd1996 in PR branch juan-fernandez/fix-happy-dom-issues with baseline commit bae4e64 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 1609 metrics, 61 unstable metrics.

slow_test_retries: {
'5s': NUM_RETRIES_EFD
// happy-dom>=19 can only be used with CJS from node 20 and above
if (NODE_MAJOR >= 20) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we instead just skip the test for those versions? And do we not have a test matrix where older versions of happy-dom would also be tested?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we instead just skip the test for those versions?

sure, I can do that

And do we not have a test matrix where older versions of happy-dom would also be tested?

not at the moment, no. We don't test the older versions for jest integration tests. This was a conscious decision back then, I think because we were content with the plugin tests testing older versions. But I want to eventually get rid of the plugin tests, so this should be revisited.

Copy link

datadog-official bot commented Oct 1, 2025

✅ Tests

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 0dd1996 | Docs | Was this helpful? Give us feedback!

@juan-fernandez juan-fernandez merged commit 5374f69 into master Oct 2, 2025
728 checks passed
@juan-fernandez juan-fernandez deleted the juan-fernandez/fix-happy-dom-issues branch October 2, 2025 08:42
dd-octo-sts bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2025
CarlesDD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants