Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

False Positive Status: Update docs #12332

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2025
Merged

False Positive Status: Update docs #12332

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2025

Conversation

Maffooch
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Maffooch Maffooch requested a review from mtesauro as a code owner April 28, 2025 22:26
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Apr 28, 2025
Copy link

DryRun Security

No security concerns detected in this pull request.


All finding details can be found in the DryRun Security Dashboard.

Copy link
Contributor

@mtesauro mtesauro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@valentijnscholten
Copy link
Member

Is the False Positive History feature (that also works with import) still a thing? I think that's why the original text was there.

@paulOsinski
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good!

@Maffooch
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is the False Positive History feature (that also works with import) still a thing? I think that's why the original text was there.

Yes, False Positive History is still a thing, but it was not actually mentioned in the original text. It may be worth making a separate write up for false positive history. Is that something you would be willing to take on?

@Maffooch Maffooch added this to the 2.46.0 milestone Apr 29, 2025
@valentijnscholten
Copy link
Member

Is the False Positive History feature (that also works with import) still a thing? I think that's why the original text was there.

Yes, False Positive History is still a thing, but it was not actually mentioned in the original text. It may be worth making a separate write up for false positive history. Is that something you would be willing to take on?

I have never used it and I am not sure I am aware of the original use case / goal it is trying to achieve. Happy to leave it for now.

@Maffooch
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's leave it for now and revisit in the future

@Maffooch Maffooch merged commit 09acb3a into bugfix Apr 30, 2025
79 checks passed
@Maffooch Maffooch deleted the Maffooch-patch-1 branch April 30, 2025 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants