Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

DelSkayn
Copy link
Owner

Adds the poll_schedular and listen_spawn method.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 74.19355% with 16 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.37%. Comparing base (304db5d) to head (1196234).

Files Patch % Lines
core/src/runtime/schedular.rs 56.66% 13 Missing ⚠️
core/src/context/ctx.rs 50.00% 3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #313      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.31%   68.37%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines       12237    12299      +62     
==========================================
+ Hits         8360     8410      +50     
- Misses       3877     3889      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DelSkayn
Copy link
Owner Author

DelSkayn commented Jun 4, 2024

Hmmm, I am still having some problems finding a good API here.

This PR has the problem that exposing poll and such introduces the ability to poll recursively: polling the scheduler from within a future currently being polled in the scheduler. The scheduler wasn't really designed with that in mind. I can add support for it but it is still hacky and I am not sure I want to expose this type of API.

@richarddd
Copy link
Collaborator

Hmmm, I am still having some problems finding a good API here.

This PR has the problem that exposing poll and such introduces the ability to poll recursively: polling the scheduler from within a future currently being polled in the scheduler. The scheduler wasn't really designed with that in mind. I can add support for it but it is still hacky and I am not sure I want to expose this type of API.

Thanks for the status update, I really appreciate the effort. Does this also mean that #312 is obsolete? All current blockers goes away if promises also drove spawned tasks forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants