-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
Fix type annotations #13358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix type annotations #13358
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @GameRoMan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses an issue with type annotations in the app.py
file. Specifically, it replaces the or
operator with the |
operator for specifying a union of types in the return type annotation of the template_test
function.
Highlights
- Type Annotation Update: The
or
operator in the return type annotationstr or (str, int)
has been replaced with the|
operator, resulting instr | (str, int)
. This change improves code clarity and aligns with modern Python type hinting conventions.
Changelog
- trace/cloud-trace-demo-app-opentelemetry/app/app.py
- Replaced
or
with|
in the return type annotation of thetemplate_test
function.
- Replaced
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
In Python's realm, types align,
'Or' fades, a union shines.
A pipe stands tall,
Answering the call,
For clarity, a design divine.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request updates the type annotation in the template_test
function to use the union operator |
instead of or
. This is a good change as it improves readability and is the preferred way to define union types in newer versions of Python.
Merge Readiness
The code change is a small but valuable improvement to type hinting. I recommend merging this pull request. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for contributing to improving our samples! We appreciate it.
The Python 3.9 failure is expected, the Python 3.13 build failure has TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'type' and 'tuple' so it looks like this needs some improvements. |
the type hint str | (str, int) is not the correct syntax for defining a union type that includes a tuple.
No description provided.