-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.6k
Storage: add KMS samples #1510
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Storage: add KMS samples #1510
Conversation
Still TODO:
@andrewsg @theacodes can you PTAL whenever you get a chance? wanted to get this up quick for review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks pretty good for me, but @andrewsg should approve
Should I make the That'd be something like moving it into the test body and catching |
Nah you don't need to make it optional.
…On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:33 PM Chris Broadfoot ***@***.***> wrote:
Should I make the CLOUD_KMS_KEY env var optional? Probably yes?
That'd be something like moving it into the test body and catching
KeyError for py36 and checking if empty for py27?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1510 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUc8PwPOhddxL2y7I38SmELDb_hurDks5t3ejfgaJpZM4USac7>
.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
samples LGTM, @andrewsg to approve.
It looks like our Travis build is failing because of the CLOUD_KMS_KEY thing. Let's either revisit the question of whether to make it optional, or else add it to the env vars on our test environment. |
Can we add it to env vars? |
Is there a way I can help here? |
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the |
Added CLA:yes, I'm okay with my contributions being added to repo. |
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) |
Thanks! |
Two items pending and will send a follow-up PR for:
|
No description provided.