Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

chore: ossf-scorecard #10748

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: ossf-scorecard #10748

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

NathanWalker
Copy link
Contributor

@NathanWalker NathanWalker commented Jun 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Introduced an automated workflow to run OpenSSF Scorecard security analysis on the repository, with results integrated into GitHub's code scanning dashboard.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file has been added to automate OpenSSF Scorecard supply-chain security analysis. The workflow runs on specific triggers, executes the Scorecard action, and uploads results to both GitHub's code scanning dashboard and as an artifact, with options for further integration and reporting.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/ossf-scorecard.yml Added workflow for automated OpenSSF Scorecard analysis, result upload, and optional reporting steps

Poem

A rabbit hops through code so neat,
With Scorecard checks, security’s sweet!
On Wednesdays it runs, on pushes too,
Uploads the results for all to view.
With badges and scans, we’re safe and sound—
In this warren, strong supply chains abound! 🐇🔒


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jun 23, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit a8de217.

Command Status Duration Result
nx test apps-automated -c=android ✅ Succeeded 1s View ↗
nx run-many --target=test --configuration=ci --... ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-06-28 20:40:20 UTC

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ossf-scorecard.yml (2)

21-30: Add concurrency to avoid overlapping runs

Without a concurrency group, multiple triggers (e.g., cron + push) can queue redundant Scorecard analyses. Consider cancelling in-flight runs when a new one starts.

    concurrency:
      group: ossf-scorecard-${{ github.ref_name }}
      cancel-in-progress: true

17-19: Scope default permissions to the minimum

Granting read-all at the workflow level may be overly permissive. You can default to no permissions and explicitly opt into the required scopes at the job level.

- permissions: read-all
+ permissions: {}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8979ad8 and e374408.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ossf-scorecard.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: test-ios
  • GitHub Check: test-android
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (java-kotlin)

Comment on lines +24 to +26
# `publish_results: true` only works when run from the default branch. conditional can be removed if disabled.
if: github.event.repository.default_branch == github.ref_name || github.event_name == 'pull_request'
permissions:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the job-level filter to include scheduled and branch-protection runs

The current if only allows default-branch pushes or PRs, blocking both your cron and branch-protection triggers.

Apply this diff to also run on schedule and branch_protection_rule events:

-    if: github.event.repository.default_branch == github.ref_name || github.event_name == 'pull_request'
+    if: >
+      github.event_name == 'schedule' ||
+      github.event_name == 'branch_protection_rule' ||
+      github.event.repository.default_branch == github.ref_name ||
+      github.event_name == 'pull_request'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# `publish_results: true` only works when run from the default branch. conditional can be removed if disabled.
if: github.event.repository.default_branch == github.ref_name || github.event_name == 'pull_request'
permissions:
# `publish_results: true` only works when run from the default branch. conditional can be removed if disabled.
if: >
github.event_name == 'schedule' ||
github.event_name == 'branch_protection_rule' ||
github.event.repository.default_branch == github.ref_name ||
github.event_name == 'pull_request'
permissions:
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/ossf-scorecard.yml around lines 24 to 26, the job-level
`if` condition currently only allows runs on default branch pushes or pull
requests, which blocks scheduled (cron) and branch protection rule events.
Update the `if` condition to also include `schedule` and
`branch_protection_rule` events by adding checks for these event names alongside
the existing conditions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant