This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 10, 2024. It is now read-only.
ARM: dts: qcom: Disable wsa881x codecs #3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Our device does not have this codecs... kernel dmesg: [ 12.299956]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.20170211 failed with error -22 [ 13.002387]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.20170212 failed with error -22 [ 13.008922]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.21170213 failed with error -22 [ 13.010005]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.21170214 failed with error -22
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2020
[ Upstream commit 71a174b39f10b4b93223d374722aa894b5d8a82e ] b6da31b2c07c "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b2c07c ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2020
[ Upstream commit e773ca7da8beeca7f17fe4c9d1284a2b66839cc1 ] Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2020
commit ca10845a56856fff4de3804c85e6424d0f6d0cde upstream While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x: f3cd2c58110dad14e: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> [sudip: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit 4a9d81caf841cd2c0ae36abec9c2963bf21d0284 ] If the elem is deleted during be iterated on it, the iteration process will fall into an endless loop. kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [nfsd:17137] PID: 17137 TASK: ffff8818d93c0000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "nfsd" [exception RIP: __state_in_grace+76] RIP: ffffffffc00e817c RSP: ffff8818d3aefc98 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffff881dc0c38298 RBX: ffffffff81b03580 RCX: ffff881dc02c9f50 RDX: ffff881e3fce8500 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff81b03580 RBP: ffff8818d3aefca0 R8: 0000000000000020 R9: ffff8818d3aefd40 R10: ffff88017fc03800 R11: ffff8818e83933c0 R12: ffff8818d3aefd40 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8818e8391068 R15: ffff8818fa6e4000 CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #0 [ffff8818d3aefc98] opens_in_grace at ffffffffc00e81e3 [grace] #1 [ffff8818d3aefca8] nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op at ffffffffc02a3e6c [nfsd] #2 [ffff8818d3aefd18] nfsd4_write at ffffffffc028ed5b [nfsd] #3 [ffff8818d3aefd80] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffc0290a0d [nfsd] #4 [ffff8818d3aefdd0] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffc027b800 [nfsd] #5 [ffff8818d3aefe08] svc_process_common at ffffffffc02017f3 [sunrpc] #6 [ffff8818d3aefe70] svc_process at ffffffffc0201ce3 [sunrpc] #7 [ffff8818d3aefe98] nfsd at ffffffffc027b117 [nfsd] #8 [ffff8818d3aefec8] kthread at ffffffff810b88c1 #9 [ffff8818d3aeff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff816d1607 The troublemake elem: crash> lock_manager ffff881dc0c38298 struct lock_manager { list = { next = 0xffff881dc0c38298, prev = 0xffff881dc0c38298 }, block_opens = false } Fixes: c87fb4a ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens") Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2021
[ Upstream commit c5c97cadd7ed13381cb6b4bef5c841a66938d350 ]
The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw
data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the
array after it.
The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have
an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data.
27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4:
runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type
'__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here
00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
^
#0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13
#1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8
#2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9
#3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9
#4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9
#5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4
#6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9
#7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11
#8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8
#9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2
#10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3
#11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc)
#12 0x561532596828 in _start ...
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use
util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in
Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2021
commit 90bd070aae6c4fb5d302f9c4b9c88be60c8197ec upstream. The following deadlock is detected: truncate -> setattr path is waiting for pending direct IO to be done (inode->i_dio_count become zero) with inode->i_rwsem held (down_write). PID: 14827 TASK: ffff881686a9af80 CPU: 20 COMMAND: "ora_p005_hrltd9" #0 __schedule at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule at ffffffff81866de6 #2 inode_dio_wait at ffffffff812a2d04 #3 ocfs2_setattr at ffffffffc05f322e [ocfs2] #4 notify_change at ffffffff812a5a09 #5 do_truncate at ffffffff812808f5 #6 do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.18 at ffffffff81280cf2 #7 sys_ftruncate at ffffffff81280d8e #8 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003949 #9 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81a001ad dio completion path is going to complete one direct IO (decrement inode->i_dio_count), but before that it hung at locking inode->i_rwsem: #0 __schedule+700 at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule+54 at ffffffff81866de6 #2 rwsem_down_write_failed+536 at ffffffff8186aa28 #3 call_rwsem_down_write_failed+23 at ffffffff8185a1b7 #4 down_write+45 at ffffffff81869c9d #5 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write+180 at ffffffffc05d5444 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_dio_end_io+85 at ffffffffc05d5a85 [ocfs2] #7 dio_complete+140 at ffffffff812c873c #8 dio_aio_complete_work+25 at ffffffff812c89f9 #9 process_one_work+361 at ffffffff810b1889 #10 worker_thread+77 at ffffffff810b233d #11 kthread+261 at ffffffff810b7fd5 #12 ret_from_fork+62 at ffffffff81a0035e Thus above forms ABBA deadlock. The same deadlock was mentioned in upstream commit 28f5a8a7c033 ("ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()"). It seems that that commit only removed the cluster lock (the victim of above dead lock) from the ABBA deadlock party. End-user visible effects: Process hang in truncate -> ocfs2_setattr path and other processes hang at ocfs2_dio_end_io_write path. This is to fix the deadlock itself. It removes inode_lock() call from dio completion path to remove the deadlock and add ip_alloc_sem lock in setattr path to synchronize the inode modifications. [[email protected]: remove the "had_alloc_lock" as suggested] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2021
commit 438553958ba19296663c6d6583d208dfb6792830 upstream.
The ordering of MSI-X enable in hardware is dysfunctional:
1) MSI-X is disabled in the control register
2) Various setup functions
3) pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs() is invoked which ends up accessing
the MSI-X table entries
4) MSI-X is enabled and masked in the control register with the
comment that enabling is required for some hardware to access
the MSI-X table
Step #4 obviously contradicts #3. The history of this is an issue with the
NIU hardware. When #4 was introduced the table access actually happened in
msix_program_entries() which was invoked after enabling and masking MSI-X.
This was changed in commit d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of
irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") which removed the table write
from msix_program_entries().
Interestingly enough nobody noticed and either NIU still works or it did
not get any testing with a kernel 3.19 or later.
Nevertheless this is inconsistent and there is no reason why MSI-X can't be
enabled and masked in the control register early on, i.e. move step #4
above to step #1. This preserves the NIU workaround and has no side effects
on other hardware.
Fixes: d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2021
Sergey Suloev reported a crash happening in drm_client_dev_hotplug() when fbdev had failed to register. [ 9.124598] vc4_hdmi 3f902000.hdmi: ASoC: Failed to create component debugfs directory [ 9.147667] vc4_hdmi 3f902000.hdmi: vc4-hdmi-hifi <-> 3f902000.hdmi mapping ok [ 9.155184] vc4_hdmi 3f902000.hdmi: ASoC: no DMI vendor name! [ 9.166544] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3f902000.hdmi (ops vc4_hdmi_ops [vc4]) [ 9.173840] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3f806000.vec (ops vc4_vec_ops [vc4]) [ 9.181029] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3f004000.txp (ops vc4_txp_ops [vc4]) [ 9.188519] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3f400000.hvs (ops vc4_hvs_ops [vc4]) [ 9.195690] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3f206000.pixelvalve (ops vc4_crtc_ops [vc4]) [ 9.203523] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3f207000.pixelvalve (ops vc4_crtc_ops [vc4]) [ 9.215032] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3f807000.pixelvalve (ops vc4_crtc_ops [vc4]) [ 9.274785] vc4-drm soc:gpu: bound 3fc00000.v3d (ops vc4_v3d_ops [vc4]) [ 9.290246] [drm] Initialized vc4 0.0.0 20140616 for soc:gpu on minor 0 [ 9.297464] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [ 9.304600] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [ 9.382856] vc4-drm soc:gpu: [drm:drm_fb_helper_fbdev_setup [drm_kms_helper]] *ERROR* Failed to set fbdev configuration [ 10.404937] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00330a656369768a [ 10.441620] [00330a656369768a] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 10.449087] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 10.454762] Modules linked in: brcmfmac vc4 drm_kms_helper cfg80211 drm rfkill smsc95xx brcmutil usbnet drm_panel_orientation_quirks raspberrypi_hwmon bcm2835_dma crc32_ce pwm_bcm2835 bcm2835_rng virt_dma rng_core i2c_bcm2835 ip_tables x_tables ipv6 [ 10.477296] CPU: 2 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc5 #3 [ 10.483934] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 (DT) [ 10.489966] Workqueue: events output_poll_execute [drm_kms_helper] [ 10.596515] Process kworker/2:1 (pid: 45, stack limit = 0x000000007e8924dc) [ 10.603590] Call trace: [ 10.606259] drm_client_dev_hotplug+0x5c/0xb0 [drm] [ 10.611303] drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event+0x30/0x40 [drm_kms_helper] [ 10.617849] output_poll_execute+0xc4/0x1e0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 10.623616] process_one_work+0x1c8/0x318 [ 10.627695] worker_thread+0x48/0x428 [ 10.631420] kthread+0xf8/0x128 [ 10.634615] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [ 10.638255] Code: 54000220 f9401261 aa1303e0 b4000141 (f9400c21) [ 10.644456] ---[ end trace c75b4a4b0e141908 ]--- The reason for this is that drm_fbdev_cma_init() removes the drm_client when fbdev registration fails, but it doesn't remove the client from the drm_device client list. So the client list now has a pointer that points into the unknown and we have a 'use after free' situation. Split drm_client_new() into drm_client_init() and drm_client_add() to fix removal in the error path. Fixes: 894a677f4b3e ("drm/cma-helper: Use the generic fbdev emulation") Reported-by: Sergey Suloev <[email protected]> Cc: Stefan Wahren <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <[email protected]> as the existing changes are not present.] Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Patch-mainline: [email protected] @ 01/10/18, 07:45 p.m. [[email protected]: drop changes for drm_fb_helper.c and drm_fb_cma_helper.c]. Change-Id: I7cd0651e06a55095672ed6c9e7a885a4cfdba075 Signed-off-by: Shubham Talekar <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2022
[ Upstream commit af68656d66eda219b7f55ce8313a1da0312c79e1 ] While handling PCI errors (AER flow) driver tries to disable NAPI [napi_disable()] after NAPI is deleted [__netif_napi_del()] which causes unexpected system hang/crash. System message log shows the following: ======================================= [ 3222.537510] EEH: Detected PCI bus error on PHB#384-PE#800000 [ 3222.537511] EEH: This PCI device has failed 2 times in the last hour and will be permanently disabled after 5 failures. [ 3222.537512] EEH: Notify device drivers to shutdown [ 3222.537513] EEH: Beginning: 'error_detected(IO frozen)' [ 3222.537514] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): Invoking bnx2x->error_detected(IO frozen) [ 3222.537516] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_error_detected:14236(eth14)]IO error detected [ 3222.537650] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): bnx2x driver reports: 'need reset' [ 3222.537651] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.1): Invoking bnx2x->error_detected(IO frozen) [ 3222.537651] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_error_detected:14236(eth13)]IO error detected [ 3222.537729] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.1): bnx2x driver reports: 'need reset' [ 3222.537729] EEH: Finished:'error_detected(IO frozen)' with aggregate recovery state:'need reset' [ 3222.537890] EEH: Collect temporary log [ 3222.583481] EEH: of node=0384:80:00.0 [ 3222.583519] EEH: PCI device/vendor: 168e14e4 [ 3222.583557] EEH: PCI cmd/status register: 00100140 [ 3222.583557] EEH: PCI-E capabilities and status follow: [ 3222.583744] EEH: PCI-E 00: 00020010 012c8da 00095d5e 00455c82 [ 3222.583892] EEH: PCI-E 10: 10820000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.583893] EEH: PCI-E 20: 00000000 [ 3222.583893] EEH: PCI-E AER capability register set follows: [ 3222.584079] EEH: PCI-E AER 00: 13c10001 00000000 00000000 00062030 [ 3222.584230] EEH: PCI-E AER 10: 00002000 000031c0 000001e0 00000000 [ 3222.584378] EEH: PCI-E AER 20: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584416] EEH: PCI-E AER 30: 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584416] EEH: of node=0384:80:00.1 [ 3222.584454] EEH: PCI device/vendor: 168e14e4 [ 3222.584491] EEH: PCI cmd/status register: 00100140 [ 3222.584492] EEH: PCI-E capabilities and status follow: [ 3222.584677] EEH: PCI-E 00: 00020010 012c8da 00095d5e 00455c82 [ 3222.584825] EEH: PCI-E 10: 10820000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584826] EEH: PCI-E 20: 00000000 [ 3222.584826] EEH: PCI-E AER capability register set follows: [ 3222.585011] EEH: PCI-E AER 00: 13c10001 00000000 00000000 00062030 [ 3222.585160] EEH: PCI-E AER 10: 00002000 000031c0 000001e0 00000000 [ 3222.585309] EEH: PCI-E AER 20: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.585347] EEH: PCI-E AER 30: 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.586872] RTAS: event: 5, Type: Platform Error (224), Severity: 2 [ 3222.586873] EEH: Reset without hotplug activity [ 3224.762767] EEH: Beginning: 'slot_reset' [ 3224.762770] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): Invoking bnx2x->slot_reset() [ 3224.762771] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_slot_reset:14271(eth14)]IO slot reset initializing... [ 3224.762887] bnx2x 0384:80:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) [ 3224.768157] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_slot_reset:14287(eth14)]IO slot reset --> driver unload Uninterruptible tasks ===================== crash> ps | grep UN 213 2 11 c000000004c89e00 UN 0.0 0 0 [eehd] 215 2 0 c000000004c80000 UN 0.0 0 0 [kworker/0:2] 2196 1 28 c000000004504f00 UN 0.1 15936 11136 wickedd 4287 1 9 c00000020d076800 UN 0.0 4032 3008 agetty 4289 1 20 c00000020d056680 UN 0.0 7232 3840 agetty 32423 2 26 c00000020038c580 UN 0.0 0 0 [kworker/26:3] 32871 4241 27 c0000002609ddd00 UN 0.1 18624 11648 sshd 32920 10130 16 c00000027284a100 UN 0.1 48512 12608 sendmail 33092 32987 0 c000000205218b00 UN 0.1 48512 12608 sendmail 33154 4567 16 c000000260e51780 UN 0.1 48832 12864 pickup 33209 4241 36 c000000270cb6500 UN 0.1 18624 11712 sshd 33473 33283 0 c000000205211480 UN 0.1 48512 12672 sendmail 33531 4241 37 c00000023c902780 UN 0.1 18624 11648 sshd EEH handler hung while bnx2x sleeping and holding RTNL lock =========================================================== crash> bt 213 PID: 213 TASK: c000000004c89e00 CPU: 11 COMMAND: "eehd" #0 [c000000004d477e0] __schedule at c000000000c70808 #1 [c000000004d478b0] schedule at c000000000c70ee0 #2 [c000000004d478e0] schedule_timeout at c000000000c76dec #3 [c000000004d479c0] msleep at c0000000002120cc #4 [c000000004d479f0] napi_disable at c000000000a06448 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ #5 [c000000004d47a30] bnx2x_netif_stop at c0080000018dba94 [bnx2x] #6 [c000000004d47a60] bnx2x_io_slot_reset at c0080000018a551c [bnx2x] #7 [c000000004d47b20] eeh_report_reset at c00000000004c9bc #8 [c000000004d47b90] eeh_pe_report at c00000000004d1a8 #9 [c000000004d47c40] eeh_handle_normal_event at c00000000004da64 And the sleeping source code ============================ crash> dis -ls c000000000a06448 FILE: ../net/core/dev.c LINE: 6702 6697 { 6698 might_sleep(); 6699 set_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state); 6700 6701 while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state)) * 6702 msleep(1); 6703 while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &n->state)) 6704 msleep(1); 6705 6706 hrtimer_cancel(&n->timer); 6707 6708 clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state); 6709 } EEH calls into bnx2x twice based on the system log above, first through bnx2x_io_error_detected() and then bnx2x_io_slot_reset(), and executes the following call chains: bnx2x_io_error_detected() +-> bnx2x_eeh_nic_unload() +-> bnx2x_del_all_napi() +-> __netif_napi_del() bnx2x_io_slot_reset() +-> bnx2x_netif_stop() +-> bnx2x_napi_disable() +->napi_disable() Fix this by correcting the sequence of NAPI APIs usage, that is delete the NAPI after disabling it. Fixes: 7fa6f34 ("bnx2x: AER revised") Reported-by: David Christensen <[email protected]> Tested-by: David Christensen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2022
[ Upstream commit 1b710b1b10eff9d46666064ea25f079f70bc67a8 ]
Sergey didn't like the locking order,
uart_port->lock -> tty_port->lock
uart_write (uart_port->lock)
__uart_start
pl011_start_tx
pl011_tx_chars
uart_write_wakeup
tty_port_tty_wakeup
tty_port_default
tty_port_tty_get (tty_port->lock)
but those code is so old, and I have no clue how to de-couple it after
checking other locks in the splat. There is an onging effort to make all
printk() as deferred, so until that happens, workaround it for now as a
short-term fix.
LTP: starting iogen01 (export LTPROOT; rwtest -N iogen01 -i 120s -s
read,write -Da -Dv -n 2 500b:$TMPDIR/doio.f1.$$
1000b:$TMPDIR/doio.f2.$$)
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
------------------------------------------------------
doio/49441 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff008b7cff7290 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: rmqueue+0x138/0x2050
but task is already holding lock:
60ff000822352818 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}, at: start_flush_work+0xd8/0x3f0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}:
lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
_raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
__queue_work+0x4b4/0xa10
queue_work_on+0xac/0x11c
tty_schedule_flip+0x84/0xbc
tty_flip_buffer_push+0x1c/0x28
pty_write+0x98/0xd0
n_tty_write+0x450/0x60c
tty_write+0x338/0x474
__vfs_write+0x88/0x214
vfs_write+0x12c/0x1a4
redirected_tty_write+0x90/0xdc
do_loop_readv_writev+0x140/0x180
do_iter_write+0xe0/0x10c
vfs_writev+0x134/0x1cc
do_writev+0xbc/0x130
__arm64_sys_writev+0x58/0x8c
el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
el0_sync+0x164/0x180
-> #3 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}:
lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x7c/0x9c
tty_port_tty_get+0x24/0x60
tty_port_default_wakeup+0x1c/0x3c
tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x34/0x40
uart_write_wakeup+0x28/0x44
pl011_tx_chars+0x1b8/0x270
pl011_start_tx+0x24/0x70
__uart_start+0x5c/0x68
uart_write+0x164/0x1c8
do_output_char+0x33c/0x348
n_tty_write+0x4bc/0x60c
tty_write+0x338/0x474
redirected_tty_write+0xc0/0xdc
do_loop_readv_writev+0x140/0x180
do_iter_write+0xe0/0x10c
vfs_writev+0x134/0x1cc
do_writev+0xbc/0x130
__arm64_sys_writev+0x58/0x8c
el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
el0_sync+0x164/0x180
-> #2 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
_raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
pl011_console_write+0xec/0x2cc
console_unlock+0x794/0x96c
vprintk_emit+0x260/0x31c
vprintk_default+0x54/0x7c
vprintk_func+0x218/0x254
printk+0x7c/0xa4
register_console+0x734/0x7b0
uart_add_one_port+0x734/0x834
pl011_register_port+0x6c/0xac
sbsa_uart_probe+0x234/0x2ec
platform_drv_probe+0xd4/0x124
really_probe+0x250/0x71c
driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x200
__device_attach_driver+0xd8/0x188
bus_for_each_drv+0xbc/0x110
__device_attach+0x120/0x220
device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c
bus_probe_device+0x54/0x100
device_add+0xae8/0xc2c
platform_device_add+0x278/0x3b8
platform_device_register_full+0x238/0x2ac
acpi_create_platform_device+0x2dc/0x3a8
acpi_bus_attach+0x390/0x3cc
acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3cc
acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3cc
acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3cc
acpi_bus_scan+0x7c/0xb0
acpi_scan_init+0xe4/0x304
acpi_init+0x100/0x114
do_one_initcall+0x348/0x6a0
do_initcall_level+0x190/0x1fc
do_basic_setup+0x34/0x4c
kernel_init_freeable+0x19c/0x260
kernel_init+0x18/0x338
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
-> #1 (console_owner){-...}:
lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
console_lock_spinning_enable+0x6c/0x7c
console_unlock+0x4f8/0x96c
vprintk_emit+0x260/0x31c
vprintk_default+0x54/0x7c
vprintk_func+0x218/0x254
printk+0x7c/0xa4
get_random_u64+0x1c4/0x1dc
shuffle_pick_tail+0x40/0xac
__free_one_page+0x424/0x710
free_one_page+0x70/0x120
__free_pages_ok+0x61c/0xa94
__free_pages_core+0x1bc/0x294
memblock_free_pages+0x38/0x48
__free_pages_memory+0xcc/0xfc
__free_memory_core+0x70/0x78
free_low_memory_core_early+0x148/0x18c
memblock_free_all+0x18/0x54
mem_init+0xb4/0x17c
mm_init+0x14/0x38
start_kernel+0x19c/0x530
-> #0 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){..-.}:
validate_chain+0xf6c/0x2e2c
__lock_acquire+0x868/0xc2c
lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
_raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
rmqueue+0x138/0x2050
get_page_from_freelist+0x474/0x688
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3b4/0x18dc
alloc_pages_current+0xd0/0xe0
alloc_slab_page+0x2b4/0x5e0
new_slab+0xc8/0x6bc
___slab_alloc+0x3b8/0x640
kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b4/0x588
__debug_object_init+0x778/0x8b4
debug_object_init_on_stack+0x40/0x50
start_flush_work+0x16c/0x3f0
__flush_work+0xb8/0x124
flush_work+0x20/0x30
xlog_cil_force_lsn+0x88/0x204 [xfs]
xfs_log_force_lsn+0x128/0x1b8 [xfs]
xfs_file_fsync+0x3c4/0x488 [xfs]
vfs_fsync_range+0xb0/0xd0
generic_write_sync+0x80/0xa0 [xfs]
xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x66c/0x6e4 [xfs]
xfs_file_write_iter+0x1a0/0x218 [xfs]
__vfs_write+0x1cc/0x214
vfs_write+0x12c/0x1a4
ksys_write+0xb0/0x120
__arm64_sys_write+0x54/0x88
el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
el0_sync+0x164/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&(&zone->lock)->rlock --> &(&port->lock)->rlock --> &pool->lock/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&pool->lock/1);
lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
lock(&pool->lock/1);
lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by doio/49441:
#0: a0ff00886fc27408 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x118/0x1a4
#1: 8fff00080810dfe0 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}, at:
xfs_ilock+0x2a8/0x300 [xfs]
#2: ffff9000129f2390 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at:
rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
#3: 60ff000822352818 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}, at:
start_flush_work+0xd8/0x3f0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 48 PID: 49441 Comm: doio Tainted: G W
Hardware name: HPE Apollo 70 /C01_APACHE_MB , BIOS
L50_5.13_1.11 06/18/2019
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x248
show_stack+0x20/0x2c
dump_stack+0xe8/0x150
print_circular_bug+0x368/0x380
check_noncircular+0x28c/0x294
validate_chain+0xf6c/0x2e2c
__lock_acquire+0x868/0xc2c
lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
_raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
rmqueue+0x138/0x2050
get_page_from_freelist+0x474/0x688
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3b4/0x18dc
alloc_pages_current+0xd0/0xe0
alloc_slab_page+0x2b4/0x5e0
new_slab+0xc8/0x6bc
___slab_alloc+0x3b8/0x640
kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b4/0x588
__debug_object_init+0x778/0x8b4
debug_object_init_on_stack+0x40/0x50
start_flush_work+0x16c/0x3f0
__flush_work+0xb8/0x124
flush_work+0x20/0x30
xlog_cil_force_lsn+0x88/0x204 [xfs]
xfs_log_force_lsn+0x128/0x1b8 [xfs]
xfs_file_fsync+0x3c4/0x488 [xfs]
vfs_fsync_range+0xb0/0xd0
generic_write_sync+0x80/0xa0 [xfs]
xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x66c/0x6e4 [xfs]
xfs_file_write_iter+0x1a0/0x218 [xfs]
__vfs_write+0x1cc/0x214
vfs_write+0x12c/0x1a4
ksys_write+0xb0/0x120
__arm64_sys_write+0x54/0x88
el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
el0_sync+0x164/0x180
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2022
In 2019, Sergey fixed a lockdep splat with 15341b1dd409 ("char/random:
silence a lockdep splat with printk()"), but that got reverted soon
after from 4.19 because back then it apparently caused various problems.
But the issue it was fixing is still there, and more generally, many
patches turning printk() into printk_deferred() have landed since,
making me suspect it's okay to try this out again.
This should fix the following deadlock found by the kernel test robot:
[ 18.287691] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 18.287692] 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1 Not tainted
[ 18.287693] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 18.287712] stop/202 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 18.287713] (ptrval) (console_owner){..-.}, at: console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287717]
[ 18.287718] but task is already holding lock:
[ 18.287718] (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287722]
[ 18.287722] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 18.287723]
[ 18.287724]
[ 18.287725] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 18.287725]
[ 18.287726] -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}:
[ 18.287729] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287729] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287730] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287731] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (??:?)
[ 18.287732] tty_port_tty_get (??:?)
[ 18.287733] tty_port_default_wakeup (tty_port.c:?)
[ 18.287734] tty_port_tty_wakeup (??:?)
[ 18.287734] uart_write_wakeup (??:?)
[ 18.287735] serial8250_tx_chars (??:?)
[ 18.287736] serial8250_handle_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287737] serial8250_default_handle_irq (8250_port.c:?)
[ 18.287738] serial8250_interrupt (8250_core.c:?)
[ 18.287738] __handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[ 18.287739] handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[ 18.287740] handle_irq_event (??:?)
[ 18.287741] handle_edge_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287742] handle_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287742] do_IRQ (??:?)
[ 18.287743] common_interrupt (entry_32.o:?)
[ 18.287744] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (??:?)
[ 18.287745] uart_write (serial_core.c:?)
[ 18.287746] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287747] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287747] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287748] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287749] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287750] ksys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287750] sys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287751] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287752] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287752]
[ 18.287753] -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
[ 18.287756]
[ 18.287756] -> #0 (console_owner){..-.}:
[ 18.287759] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287760] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287761] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287761] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287762] console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287763] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[ 18.287764] vprintk_default (??:?)
[ 18.287764] vprintk_func (??:?)
[ 18.287765] printk (??:?)
[ 18.287766] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[ 18.287767] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287767] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287768] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287769] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[ 18.287770] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[ 18.287770] __kmalloc (??:?)
[ 18.287771] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287772] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287773] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[ 18.287774] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287775] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287776] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287777] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287778] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287779] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287780] ksys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287780] sys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287781] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287782] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287783]
[ 18.287783] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 18.287784]
[ 18.287785] Chain exists of:
[ 18.287785] console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &(&port->lock)->rlock
[ 18.287789]
[ 18.287790] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 18.287790]
[ 18.287791] CPU0 CPU1
[ 18.287792] ---- ----
[ 18.287792] lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[ 18.287794] lock(&port_lock_key);
[ 18.287814] lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[ 18.287815] lock(console_owner);
[ 18.287817]
[ 18.287818] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 18.287818]
[ 18.287819] 6 locks held by stop/202:
[ 18.287820] #0: (ptrval) (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}, at: ldsem_down_read (??:?)
[ 18.287823] #1: (ptrval) (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}, at: tty_write_lock (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287826] #2: (ptrval) (&o_tty->termios_rwsem/1){++++}, at: n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287830] #3: (ptrval) (&ldata->output_lock){+.+.}, at: process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287834] #4: (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287838] #5: (ptrval) (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning (printk.c:?)
[ 18.287841]
[ 18.287842] stack backtrace:
[ 18.287843] CPU: 0 PID: 202 Comm: stop Not tainted 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1
[ 18.287843] Call Trace:
[ 18.287844] dump_stack (??:?)
[ 18.287845] print_circular_bug.cold+0x78/0x8b
[ 18.287846] check_prev_add+0x66a/0xd20
[ 18.287847] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287848] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287848] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287849] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287850] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287851] console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287851] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287852] ? native_save_fl (??:?)
[ 18.287853] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[ 18.287854] vprintk_default (??:?)
[ 18.287855] vprintk_func (??:?)
[ 18.287855] printk (??:?)
[ 18.287856] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[ 18.287857] ? shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287858] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287858] ? page_address (??:?)
[ 18.287859] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287860] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287861] ? pvclock_clocksource_read (??:?)
[ 18.287862] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[ 18.287862] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (kvmclock.c:?)
[ 18.287863] ? __slab_alloc+0xbc/0x2e0
[ 18.287864] ? native_wbinvd (paravirt.c:?)
[ 18.287865] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[ 18.287865] __kmalloc (??:?)
[ 18.287866] ? __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287867] ? tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287868] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287869] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287869] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[ 18.287870] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287871] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287872] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287873] ? print_dl_stats (??:?)
[ 18.287874] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287874] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287875] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287876] ? tty_write_unlock (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287877] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287877] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287878] ? __fget_light (file.c:?)
[ 18.287879] ksys_write (??:?)
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Cc: Lech Perczak <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Cc: John Ogness <[email protected]>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ytz+lo4zRQYG3JUR@xsang-OptiPlex-9020
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
commit 9c6d778800b921bde3bff3cff5003d1650f942d1 upstream. Automatic kernel fuzzing revealed a recursive locking violation in usb-storage: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.18.0 #3 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/1:3/1205 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888018638db8 (&us_interface_key[i]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: usb_stor_pre_reset+0x35/0x40 drivers/usb/storage/usb.c:230 but task is already holding lock: ffff888018638db8 (&us_interface_key[i]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: usb_stor_pre_reset+0x35/0x40 drivers/usb/storage/usb.c:230 ... stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1205 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 5.18.0 #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2988 [inline] check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3031 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3816 [inline] __lock_acquire.cold+0x152/0x3ca kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5630 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x14f/0x1610 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 usb_stor_pre_reset+0x35/0x40 drivers/usb/storage/usb.c:230 usb_reset_device+0x37d/0x9a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:6109 r871xu_dev_remove+0x21a/0x270 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:622 usb_unbind_interface+0x1bd/0x890 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458 device_remove drivers/base/dd.c:545 [inline] device_remove+0x11f/0x170 drivers/base/dd.c:537 __device_release_driver drivers/base/dd.c:1222 [inline] device_release_driver_internal+0x1a7/0x2f0 drivers/base/dd.c:1248 usb_driver_release_interface+0x102/0x180 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:627 usb_forced_unbind_intf+0x4d/0xa0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:1118 usb_reset_device+0x39b/0x9a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:6114 This turned out not to be an error in usb-storage but rather a nested device reset attempt. That is, as the rtl8712 driver was being unbound from a composite device in preparation for an unrelated USB reset (that driver does not have pre_reset or post_reset callbacks), its ->remove routine called usb_reset_device() -- thus nesting one reset call within another. Performing a reset as part of disconnect processing is a questionable practice at best. However, the bug report points out that the USB core does not have any protection against nested resets. Adding a reset_in_progress flag and testing it will prevent such errors in the future. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAB7eexKUpvX-JNiLzhXBDWgfg2T9e9_0Tw4HQ6keN==voRbP0g@mail.gmail.com/ Cc: [email protected] Reported-and-tested-by: Rondreis <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2023
…g the sock [ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ] There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got NULL pointer dereference. e.g. #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757 #1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d #2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48 #3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b #4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb #5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542 #6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62 [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b] RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8aa000888000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700 RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e R8: 0000000000700000 R9: 00000000000010ae R10: ffff8a9fcb748980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a9fd1168700 R13: ffff8aa000888000 R14: 00000000002a0000 R15: 00000000000010ae ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan] #8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507 #9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45 #10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807 #11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951 #12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde #13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b #14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139 #15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a #16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3 #17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca #18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3 Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before releasing the sock. Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jjpprrrr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2023
commit 11933cf1d91d57da9e5c53822a540bbdc2656c16 upstream.
The propagate_mnt() function handles mount propagation when creating
mounts and propagates the source mount tree @source_mnt to all
applicable nodes of the destination propagation mount tree headed by
@dest_mnt.
Unfortunately it contains a bug where it fails to terminate at peers of
@source_mnt when looking up copies of the source mount that become
masters for copies of the source mount tree mounted on top of slaves in
the destination propagation tree causing a NULL dereference.
Once the mechanics of the bug are understood it's easy to trigger.
Because of unprivileged user namespaces it is available to unprivileged
users.
While fixing this bug we've gotten confused multiple times due to
unclear terminology or missing concepts. So let's start this with some
clarifications:
* The terms "master" or "peer" denote a shared mount. A shared mount
belongs to a peer group.
* A peer group is a set of shared mounts that propagate to each other.
They are identified by a peer group id. The peer group id is available
in @shared_mnt->mnt_group_id.
Shared mounts within the same peer group have the same peer group id.
The peers in a peer group can be reached via @shared_mnt->mnt_share.
* The terms "slave mount" or "dependent mount" denote a mount that
receives propagation from a peer in a peer group. IOW, shared mounts
may have slave mounts and slave mounts have shared mounts as their
master. Slave mounts of a given peer in a peer group are listed on
that peers slave list available at @shared_mnt->mnt_slave_list.
* The term "master mount" denotes a mount in a peer group. IOW, it
denotes a shared mount or a peer mount in a peer group. The term
"master mount" - or "master" for short - is mostly used when talking
in the context of slave mounts that receive propagation from a master
mount. A master mount of a slave identifies the closest peer group a
slave mount receives propagation from. The master mount of a slave can
be identified via @slave_mount->mnt_master. Different slaves may point
to different masters in the same peer group.
* Multiple peers in a peer group can have non-empty ->mnt_slave_lists.
Non-empty ->mnt_slave_lists of peers don't intersect. Consequently, to
ensure all slave mounts of a peer group are visited the
->mnt_slave_lists of all peers in a peer group have to be walked.
* Slave mounts point to a peer in the closest peer group they receive
propagation from via @slave_mnt->mnt_master (see above). Together with
these peers they form a propagation group (see below). The closest
peer group can thus be identified through the peer group id
@slave_mnt->mnt_master->mnt_group_id of the peer/master that a slave
mount receives propagation from.
* A shared-slave mount is a slave mount to a peer group pg1 while also
a peer in another peer group pg2. IOW, a peer group may receive
propagation from another peer group.
If a peer group pg1 is a slave to another peer group pg2 then all
peers in peer group pg1 point to the same peer in peer group pg2 via
->mnt_master. IOW, all peers in peer group pg1 appear on the same
->mnt_slave_list. IOW, they cannot be slaves to different peer groups.
* A pure slave mount is a slave mount that is a slave to a peer group
but is not a peer in another peer group.
* A propagation group denotes the set of mounts consisting of a single
peer group pg1 and all slave mounts and shared-slave mounts that point
to a peer in that peer group via ->mnt_master. IOW, all slave mounts
such that @slave_mnt->mnt_master->mnt_group_id is equal to
@shared_mnt->mnt_group_id.
The concept of a propagation group makes it easier to talk about a
single propagation level in a propagation tree.
For example, in propagate_mnt() the immediate peers of @dest_mnt and
all slaves of @dest_mnt's peer group form a propagation group propg1.
So a shared-slave mount that is a slave in propg1 and that is a peer
in another peer group pg2 forms another propagation group propg2
together with all slaves that point to that shared-slave mount in
their ->mnt_master.
* A propagation tree refers to all mounts that receive propagation
starting from a specific shared mount.
For example, for propagate_mnt() @dest_mnt is the start of a
propagation tree. The propagation tree ecompasses all mounts that
receive propagation from @dest_mnt's peer group down to the leafs.
With that out of the way let's get to the actual algorithm.
We know that @dest_mnt is guaranteed to be a pure shared mount or a
shared-slave mount. This is guaranteed by a check in
attach_recursive_mnt(). So propagate_mnt() will first propagate the
source mount tree to all peers in @dest_mnt's peer group:
for (n = next_peer(dest_mnt); n != dest_mnt; n = next_peer(n)) {
ret = propagate_one(n);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
Notice, that the peer propagation loop of propagate_mnt() doesn't
propagate @dest_mnt itself. @dest_mnt is mounted directly in
attach_recursive_mnt() after we propagated to the destination
propagation tree.
The mount that will be mounted on top of @dest_mnt is @source_mnt. This
copy was created earlier even before we entered attach_recursive_mnt()
and doesn't concern us a lot here.
It's just important to notice that when propagate_mnt() is called
@source_mnt will not yet have been mounted on top of @dest_mnt. Thus,
@source_mnt->mnt_parent will either still point to @source_mnt or - in
the case @source_mnt is moved and thus already attached - still to its
former parent.
For each peer @m in @dest_mnt's peer group propagate_one() will create a
new copy of the source mount tree and mount that copy @child on @m such
that @child->mnt_parent points to @m after propagate_one() returns.
propagate_one() will stash the last destination propagation node @m in
@last_dest and the last copy it created for the source mount tree in
@last_source.
Hence, if we call into propagate_one() again for the next destination
propagation node @m, @last_dest will point to the previous destination
propagation node and @last_source will point to the previous copy of the
source mount tree and mounted on @last_dest.
Each new copy of the source mount tree is created from the previous copy
of the source mount tree. This will become important later.
The peer loop in propagate_mnt() is straightforward. We iterate through
the peers copying and updating @last_source and @last_dest as we go
through them and mount each copy of the source mount tree @child on a
peer @m in @dest_mnt's peer group.
After propagate_mnt() handled the peers in @dest_mnt's peer group
propagate_mnt() will propagate the source mount tree down the
propagation tree that @dest_mnt's peer group propagates to:
for (m = next_group(dest_mnt, dest_mnt); m;
m = next_group(m, dest_mnt)) {
/* everything in that slave group */
n = m;
do {
ret = propagate_one(n);
if (ret)
goto out;
n = next_peer(n);
} while (n != m);
}
The next_group() helper will recursively walk the destination
propagation tree, descending into each propagation group of the
propagation tree.
The important part is that it takes care to propagate the source mount
tree to all peers in the peer group of a propagation group before it
propagates to the slaves to those peers in the propagation group. IOW,
it creates and mounts copies of the source mount tree that become
masters before it creates and mounts copies of the source mount tree
that become slaves to these masters.
It is important to remember that propagating the source mount tree to
each mount @m in the destination propagation tree simply means that we
create and mount new copies @child of the source mount tree on @m such
that @child->mnt_parent points to @m.
Since we know that each node @m in the destination propagation tree
headed by @dest_mnt's peer group will be overmounted with a copy of the
source mount tree and since we know that the propagation properties of
each copy of the source mount tree we create and mount at @m will mostly
mirror the propagation properties of @m. We can use that information to
create and mount the copies of the source mount tree that become masters
before their slaves.
The easy case is always when @m and @last_dest are peers in a peer group
of a given propagation group. In that case we know that we can simply
copy @last_source without having to figure out what the master for the
new copy @child of the source mount tree needs to be as we've done that
in a previous call to propagate_one().
The hard case is when we're dealing with a slave mount or a shared-slave
mount @m in a destination propagation group that we need to create and
mount a copy of the source mount tree on.
For each propagation group in the destination propagation tree we
propagate the source mount tree to we want to make sure that the copies
@child of the source mount tree we create and mount on slaves @m pick an
ealier copy of the source mount tree that we mounted on a master @m of
the destination propagation group as their master. This is a mouthful
but as far as we can tell that's the core of it all.
But, if we keep track of the masters in the destination propagation tree
@m we can use the information to find the correct master for each copy
of the source mount tree we create and mount at the slaves in the
destination propagation tree @m.
Let's walk through the base case as that's still fairly easy to grasp.
If we're dealing with the first slave in the propagation group that
@dest_mnt is in then we don't yet have marked any masters in the
destination propagation tree.
We know the master for the first slave to @dest_mnt's peer group is
simple @dest_mnt. So we expect this algorithm to yield a copy of the
source mount tree that was mounted on a peer in @dest_mnt's peer group
as the master for the copy of the source mount tree we want to mount at
the first slave @m:
for (n = m; ; n = p) {
p = n->mnt_master;
if (p == dest_master || IS_MNT_MARKED(p))
break;
}
For the first slave we walk the destination propagation tree all the way
up to a peer in @dest_mnt's peer group. IOW, the propagation hierarchy
can be walked by walking up the @mnt->mnt_master hierarchy of the
destination propagation tree @m. We will ultimately find a peer in
@dest_mnt's peer group and thus ultimately @dest_mnt->mnt_master.
Btw, here the assumption we listed at the beginning becomes important.
Namely, that peers in a peer group pg1 that are slaves in another peer
group pg2 appear on the same ->mnt_slave_list. IOW, all slaves who are
peers in peer group pg1 point to the same peer in peer group pg2 via
their ->mnt_master. Otherwise the termination condition in the code
above would be wrong and next_group() would be broken too.
So the first iteration sets:
n = m;
p = n->mnt_master;
such that @p now points to a peer or @dest_mnt itself. We walk up one
more level since we don't have any marked mounts. So we end up with:
n = dest_mnt;
p = dest_mnt->mnt_master;
If @dest_mnt's peer group is not slave to another peer group then @p is
now NULL. If @dest_mnt's peer group is a slave to another peer group
then @p now points to @dest_mnt->mnt_master points which is a master
outside the propagation tree we're dealing with.
Now we need to figure out the master for the copy of the source mount
tree we're about to create and mount on the first slave of @dest_mnt's
peer group:
do {
struct mount *parent = last_source->mnt_parent;
if (last_source == first_source)
break;
done = parent->mnt_master == p;
if (done && peers(n, parent))
break;
last_source = last_source->mnt_master;
} while (!done);
We know that @last_source->mnt_parent points to @last_dest and
@last_dest is the last peer in @dest_mnt's peer group we propagated to
in the peer loop in propagate_mnt().
Consequently, @last_source is the last copy we created and mount on that
last peer in @dest_mnt's peer group. So @last_source is the master we
want to pick.
We know that @last_source->mnt_parent->mnt_master points to
@last_dest->mnt_master. We also know that @last_dest->mnt_master is
either NULL or points to a master outside of the destination propagation
tree and so does @p. Hence:
done = parent->mnt_master == p;
is trivially true in the base condition.
We also know that for the first slave mount of @dest_mnt's peer group
that @last_dest either points @dest_mnt itself because it was
initialized to:
last_dest = dest_mnt;
at the beginning of propagate_mnt() or it will point to a peer of
@dest_mnt in its peer group. In both cases it is guaranteed that on the
first iteration @n and @parent are peers (Please note the check for
peers here as that's important.):
if (done && peers(n, parent))
break;
So, as we expected, we select @last_source, which referes to the last
copy of the source mount tree we mounted on the last peer in @dest_mnt's
peer group, as the master of the first slave in @dest_mnt's peer group.
The rest is taken care of by clone_mnt(last_source, ...). We'll skip
over that part otherwise this becomes a blogpost.
At the end of propagate_mnt() we now mark @m->mnt_master as the first
master in the destination propagation tree that is distinct from
@dest_mnt->mnt_master. IOW, we mark @dest_mnt itself as a master.
By marking @dest_mnt or one of it's peers we are able to easily find it
again when we later lookup masters for other copies of the source mount
tree we mount copies of the source mount tree on slaves @m to
@dest_mnt's peer group. This, in turn allows us to find the master we
selected for the copies of the source mount tree we mounted on master in
the destination propagation tree again.
The important part is to realize that the code makes use of the fact
that the last copy of the source mount tree stashed in @last_source was
mounted on top of the previous destination propagation node @last_dest.
What this means is that @last_source allows us to walk the destination
propagation hierarchy the same way each destination propagation node @m
does.
If we take @last_source, which is the copy of @source_mnt we have
mounted on @last_dest in the previous iteration of propagate_one(), then
we know @last_source->mnt_parent points to @last_dest but we also know
that as we walk through the destination propagation tree that
@last_source->mnt_master will point to an earlier copy of the source
mount tree we mounted one an earlier destination propagation node @m.
IOW, @last_source->mnt_parent will be our hook into the destination
propagation tree and each consecutive @last_source->mnt_master will lead
us to an earlier propagation node @m via
@last_source->mnt_master->mnt_parent.
Hence, by walking up @last_source->mnt_master, each of which is mounted
on a node that is a master @m in the destination propagation tree we can
also walk up the destination propagation hierarchy.
So, for each new destination propagation node @m we use the previous
copy of @last_source and the fact it's mounted on the previous
propagation node @last_dest via @last_source->mnt_master->mnt_parent to
determine what the master of the new copy of @last_source needs to be.
The goal is to find the _closest_ master that the new copy of the source
mount tree we are about to create and mount on a slave @m in the
destination propagation tree needs to pick. IOW, we want to find a
suitable master in the propagation group.
As the propagation structure of the source mount propagation tree we
create mirrors the propagation structure of the destination propagation
tree we can find @m's closest master - i.e., a marked master - which is
a peer in the closest peer group that @m receives propagation from. We
store that closest master of @m in @p as before and record the slave to
that master in @n
We then search for this master @p via @last_source by walking up the
master hierarchy starting from the last copy of the source mount tree
stored in @last_source that we created and mounted on the previous
destination propagation node @m.
We will try to find the master by walking @last_source->mnt_master and
by comparing @last_source->mnt_master->mnt_parent->mnt_master to @p. If
we find @p then we can figure out what earlier copy of the source mount
tree needs to be the master for the new copy of the source mount tree
we're about to create and mount at the current destination propagation
node @m.
If @last_source->mnt_master->mnt_parent and @n are peers then we know
that the closest master they receive propagation from is
@last_source->mnt_master->mnt_parent->mnt_master. If not then the
closest immediate peer group that they receive propagation from must be
one level higher up.
This builds on the earlier clarification at the beginning that all peers
in a peer group which are slaves of other peer groups all point to the
same ->mnt_master, i.e., appear on the same ->mnt_slave_list, of the
closest peer group that they receive propagation from.
However, terminating the walk has corner cases.
If the closest marked master for a given destination node @m cannot be
found by walking up the master hierarchy via @last_source->mnt_master
then we need to terminate the walk when we encounter @source_mnt again.
This isn't an arbitrary termination. It simply means that the new copy
of the source mount tree we're about to create has a copy of the source
mount tree we created and mounted on a peer in @dest_mnt's peer group as
its master. IOW, @source_mnt is the peer in the closest peer group that
the new copy of the source mount tree receives propagation from.
We absolutely have to stop @source_mnt because @last_source->mnt_master
either points outside the propagation hierarchy we're dealing with or it
is NULL because @source_mnt isn't a shared-slave.
So continuing the walk past @source_mnt would cause a NULL dereference
via @last_source->mnt_master->mnt_parent. And so we have to stop the
walk when we encounter @source_mnt again.
One scenario where this can happen is when we first handled a series of
slaves of @dest_mnt's peer group and then encounter peers in a new peer
group that is a slave to @dest_mnt's peer group. We handle them and then
we encounter another slave mount to @dest_mnt that is a pure slave to
@dest_mnt's peer group. That pure slave will have a peer in @dest_mnt's
peer group as its master. Consequently, the new copy of the source mount
tree will need to have @source_mnt as it's master. So we walk the
propagation hierarchy all the way up to @source_mnt based on
@last_source->mnt_master.
So terminate on @source_mnt, easy peasy. Except, that the check misses
something that the rest of the algorithm already handles.
If @dest_mnt has peers in it's peer group the peer loop in
propagate_mnt():
for (n = next_peer(dest_mnt); n != dest_mnt; n = next_peer(n)) {
ret = propagate_one(n);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
will consecutively update @last_source with each previous copy of the
source mount tree we created and mounted at the previous peer in
@dest_mnt's peer group. So after that loop terminates @last_source will
point to whatever copy of the source mount tree was created and mounted
on the last peer in @dest_mnt's peer group.
Furthermore, if there is even a single additional peer in @dest_mnt's
peer group then @last_source will __not__ point to @source_mnt anymore.
Because, as we mentioned above, @dest_mnt isn't even handled in this
loop but directly in attach_recursive_mnt(). So it can't even accidently
come last in that peer loop.
So the first time we handle a slave mount @m of @dest_mnt's peer group
the copy of the source mount tree we create will make the __last copy of
the source mount tree we created and mounted on the last peer in
@dest_mnt's peer group the master of the new copy of the source mount
tree we create and mount on the first slave of @dest_mnt's peer group__.
But this means that the termination condition that checks for
@source_mnt is wrong. The @source_mnt cannot be found anymore by
propagate_one(). Instead it will find the last copy of the source mount
tree we created and mounted for the last peer of @dest_mnt's peer group
again. And that is a peer of @source_mnt not @source_mnt itself.
IOW, we fail to terminate the loop correctly and ultimately dereference
@last_source->mnt_master->mnt_parent. When @source_mnt's peer group
isn't slave to another peer group then @last_source->mnt_master is NULL
causing the splat below.
For example, assume @dest_mnt is a pure shared mount and has three peers
in its peer group:
===================================================================================
mount-id mount-parent-id peer-group-id
===================================================================================
(@dest_mnt) mnt_master[216] 309 297 shared:216
\
(@source_mnt) mnt_master[218]: 609 609 shared:218
(1) mnt_master[216]: 607 605 shared:216
\
(P1) mnt_master[218]: 624 607 shared:218
(2) mnt_master[216]: 576 574 shared:216
\
(P2) mnt_master[218]: 625 576 shared:218
(3) mnt_master[216]: 545 543 shared:216
\
(P3) mnt_master[218]: 626 545 shared:218
After this sequence has been processed @last_source will point to (P3),
the copy generated for the third peer in @dest_mnt's peer group we
handled. So the copy of the source mount tree (P4) we create and mount
on the first slave of @dest_mnt's peer group:
===================================================================================
mount-id mount-parent-id peer-group-id
===================================================================================
mnt_master[216] 309 297 shared:216
/
/
(S0) mnt_slave 483 481 master:216
\
\ (P3) mnt_master[218] 626 545 shared:218
\ /
\/
(P4) mnt_slave 627 483 master:218
will pick the last copy of the source mount tree (P3) as master, not (S0).
When walking the propagation hierarchy via @last_source's master
hierarchy we encounter (P3) but not (S0), i.e., @source_mnt.
We can fix this in multiple ways:
(1) By setting @last_source to @source_mnt after we processed the peers
in @dest_mnt's peer group right after the peer loop in
propagate_mnt().
(2) By changing the termination condition that relies on finding exactly
@source_mnt to finding a peer of @source_mnt.
(3) By only moving @last_source when we actually venture into a new peer
group or some clever variant thereof.
The first two options are minimally invasive and what we want as a fix.
The third option is more intrusive but something we'd like to explore in
the near future.
This passes all LTP tests and specifically the mount propagation
testsuite part of it. It also holds up against all known reproducers of
this issues.
Final words.
First, this is a clever but __worringly__ underdocumented algorithm.
There isn't a single detailed comment to be found in next_group(),
propagate_one() or anywhere else in that file for that matter. This has
been a giant pain to understand and work through and a bug like this is
insanely difficult to fix without a detailed understanding of what's
happening. Let's not talk about the amount of time that was sunk into
fixing this.
Second, all the cool kids with access to
unshare --mount --user --map-root --propagation=unchanged
are going to have a lot of fun. IOW, triggerable by unprivileged users
while namespace_lock() lock is held.
[ 115.848393] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010
[ 115.848967] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 115.849386] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 115.849803] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 115.850012] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 115.850354] CPU: 0 PID: 15591 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7 #3
[ 115.850851] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[ 115.851510] RIP: 0010:propagate_one.part.0+0x7f/0x1a0
[ 115.851924] Code: 75 eb 4c 8b 05 c2 25 37 02 4c 89 ca 48 8b 4a 10
49 39 d0 74 1e 48 3b 81 e0 00 00 00 74 26 48 8b 92 e0 00 00 00 be 01
00 00 00 <48> 8b 4a 10 49 39 d0 75 e2 40 84 f6 74 38 4c 89 05 84 25 37
02 4d
[ 115.853441] RSP: 0018:ffffb8d5443d7d50 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 115.853865] RAX: ffff8e4d87c41c80 RBX: ffff8e4d88ded780 RCX: ffff8e4da4333a00
[ 115.854458] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8e4d88ded780
[ 115.855044] RBP: ffff8e4d88ded780 R08: ffff8e4da4338000 R09: ffff8e4da43388c0
[ 115.855693] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffffb8d540158000 R12: ffffb8d5443d7da8
[ 115.856304] R13: ffff8e4d88ded780 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 115.856859] FS: 00007f92c90c9800(0000) GS:ffff8e4dfdc00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 115.857531] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 115.858006] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000022f4c002 CR4: 00000000000706f0
[ 115.858598] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 115.859393] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 115.860099] Call Trace:
[ 115.860358] <TASK>
[ 115.860535] propagate_mnt+0x14d/0x190
[ 115.860848] attach_recursive_mnt+0x274/0x3e0
[ 115.861212] path_mount+0x8c8/0xa60
[ 115.861503] __x64_sys_mount+0xf6/0x140
[ 115.861819] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x80
[ 115.862117] ? do_faccessat+0x123/0x250
[ 115.862435] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40
[ 115.862826] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 115.863133] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40
[ 115.863527] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 115.863835] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 115.864144] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 115.864452] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170
[ 115.864775] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[ 115.865187] RIP: 0033:0x7f92c92b0ebe
[ 115.865480] Code: 48 8b 0d 75 4f 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff
c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00
00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 42 4f 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89
01 48
[ 115.866984] RSP: 002b:00007fff000aa728 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
00000000000000a5
[ 115.867607] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055a77888d6b0 RCX: 00007f92c92b0ebe
[ 115.868240] RDX: 000055a77888d8e0 RSI: 000055a77888e6e0 RDI: 000055a77888e620
[ 115.868823] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[ 115.869403] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055a77888e620
[ 115.869994] R13: 000055a77888d8e0 R14: 00000000ffffffff R15: 00007f92c93e4076
[ 115.870581] </TASK>
[ 115.870763] Modules linked in: nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4
nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6
nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink qrtr snd_intel8x0
sunrpc snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_timer intel_rapl_msr
intel_rapl_common snd vboxguest intel_powerclamp video rapl joydev
soundcore i2c_piix4 wmi fuse zram xfs vmwgfx crct10dif_pclmul
crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel polyval_clmulni polyval_generic
drm_ttm_helper ttm e1000 ghash_clmulni_intel serio_raw ata_generic
pata_acpi scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua dm_multipath
[ 115.875288] CR2: 0000000000000010
[ 115.875641] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 115.876135] RIP: 0010:propagate_one.part.0+0x7f/0x1a0
[ 115.876551] Code: 75 eb 4c 8b 05 c2 25 37 02 4c 89 ca 48 8b 4a 10
49 39 d0 74 1e 48 3b 81 e0 00 00 00 74 26 48 8b 92 e0 00 00 00 be 01
00 00 00 <48> 8b 4a 10 49 39 d0 75 e2 40 84 f6 74 38 4c 89 05 84 25 37
02 4d
[ 115.878086] RSP: 0018:ffffb8d5443d7d50 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 115.878511] RAX: ffff8e4d87c41c80 RBX: ffff8e4d88ded780 RCX: ffff8e4da4333a00
[ 115.879128] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8e4d88ded780
[ 115.879715] RBP: ffff8e4d88ded780 R08: ffff8e4da4338000 R09: ffff8e4da43388c0
[ 115.880359] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffffb8d540158000 R12: ffffb8d5443d7da8
[ 115.880962] R13: ffff8e4d88ded780 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 115.881548] FS: 00007f92c90c9800(0000) GS:ffff8e4dfdc00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 115.882234] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 115.882713] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000022f4c002 CR4: 00000000000706f0
[ 115.883314] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 115.883966] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Fixes: f2ebb3a ("smarter propagate_mnt()")
Fixes: 5ec0811 ("propogate_mnt: Handle the first propogated copy being a slave")
Cc: <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Ditang Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee (Digital Ocean) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Our device does not have this codecs...
kernel dmesg:
[ 12.299956]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.20170211 failed with error -22
[ 13.002387]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.20170212 failed with error -22
[ 13.008922]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.21170213 failed with error -22
[ 13.010005]wsa881x: probe of wsa881x.21170214 failed with error -22