Bugfix set_wavefunction in pysim#138
Merged
Merged
Conversation
added 2 commits
August 15, 2017 14:56
… simulator. If the user specifies a real valued wavefunction, then the internal state of the simulator is changed to numpy float and hence it ignores the complex parts of gates but it always gave a warning if it did.
Contributor
Author
|
In all fairness, the doc says one should use a |
damiansteiger
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2017
damiansteiger
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the user specifies a real valued wavefunction, then the internal state of the simulator is changed to numpy float and hence it ignores the complex parts of gates but it always gave a warning if it did.