Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

The results based on two different MethReg version are quite distinct.  #6

@Xiangyi-Deng

Description

@Xiangyi-Deng

Hello there,

I have a problem about MethReg package recently.

For the first time, I used below version.

## MethReg_1.8.0 with JASPAR2022
region.tf <- get_tf_in_region(
      region = regions.names,
      genome = "hg38"
    )

And now, because of packages update, the package is changed.

## MethReg_1.13.5    with JASPAR2024
region.tf <- get_tf_in_region(
      region = regions.names,
      genome = "hg38"
    )

So the problem appeared. I got two quite different results for TFBs annotation.

the human motifs from JASPAR2022 and JASPAR2024 are not the same but also not so different.

For jaspar2022, the number of core human motifs of latest version: 727 from JASAPR2022 website and 692 from your pacakge.
For jaspar2024, the number of core human motifs of latest version: 755 from JASAPR2024 website and 720 from your pacakge.

For the second version, almost each region from my data can be annotated with many TFBs.

But in the first version, about 30% regions of my the same data annotated with zero TFBs.

I was really confused and don't know where the wrong is and how to process it .

I really hope that you can give me some advice.
Thank in advance.

Best,
Xiangyi

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions