Remove standalone objects from REST API usage docs#3290
Conversation
Standalone object creation is not a pattern we want to encourage, as objects not assigned to the object tree are immediately unreachable and subject to garbage collection. This mirrors the same change made to the REST SDK usage docs in 3ddb9d6, as a result of the PR comment [1]. Remove the "Creating standalone objects" section and the "Publishing with client-generated IDs" subsection (which showed creating a standalone object). The client-generated IDs section now only shows the atomic batch example that creates and assigns in one operation, with an important note that objects should be assigned to the tree as part of the same batch. [1] #3258 (comment)
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Standalone object creation is not a pattern we want to encourage, as objects not assigned to the object tree are immediately unreachable and subject to garbage collection. This mirrors the same change made to the REST SDK usage docs in 3ddb9d6, as a result of the PR comment [1].
Remove the "Creating standalone objects" section and the "Publishing with client-generated IDs" subsection (which showed creating a standalone object). The client-generated IDs section now only shows the atomic batch example that creates and assigns in one operation, with an important note that objects should be assigned to the tree as part of the same batch.
[1] #3258 (comment)
Description
Checklist