Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

unrevised6419
Copy link
Collaborator

@unrevised6419 unrevised6419 commented Mar 18, 2020

This should behave like v2

In v2 global fetch was used at the moment when action was called. At that moment a global fetch was already provided. If fetch was not provided is was silently catch by try block and dispatched as an failure action.
In v3 we moved that global fetch as a default option. At that moment global fetch was not provided yet, and 'use strict'; complained that fetch does not exist.

Closes #241
Closes #219
Closes #249

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 21a550a on iamandrewluca:fix into 4b6a636 on agraboso:master.

@unrevised6419 unrevised6419 merged commit d98422d into agraboso:master Mar 18, 2020
@unrevised6419 unrevised6419 deleted the fix branch March 18, 2020 21:20
@unrevised6419
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ReferenceError: fetch is not defined after upgrading
3 participants