-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Minor changes #634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Minor changes #634
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ def prop_symbols(x): | |
elif is_prop_symbol(x.op): | ||
return {x} | ||
else: | ||
return {symbol for arg in x.args for symbol in prop_symbols(arg)} | ||
return set().union(*map(prop_symbols, x.args)) | ||
|
||
|
||
def constant_symbols(x): | ||
|
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ def constant_symbols(x): | |
elif is_prop_symbol(x.op) and not x.args: | ||
return {x} | ||
else: | ||
return {symbol for arg in x.args for symbol in constant_symbols(arg)} | ||
return set().union(*map(constant_symbols, x.args)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same as my above review. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If you think the comprehension is easier to understand, let's stick with that. |
||
|
||
|
||
def predicate_symbols(x): | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be honest, I prefer the comprehension to the set union with the map pointer, since it is much easier to understand (at least for me).
If both are correct, I would change it to the comprehension (which is simpler and stylistically closer to the way we do things in the repository).
That is unless the union is much, much faster or is the most popular way to deal with the problem.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The map method is efficient but I dont think we need to worry about speed as we are using only small expressions. Since it is not directly mentioned in any pseudocode, people could think of it as a simple blackbox function and not really care to look into it. Finally, it's upto @norvig
Maybe we can use both. One in each of the functions :D