-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Smoke tests: Xenserver - Fix consistent failure noticed on scale VM test #10741
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@blueorangutan package |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #10741 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 16.02% 16.09% +0.07%
- Complexity 13124 13229 +105
============================================
Files 5652 5652
Lines 495921 498496 +2575
Branches 60053 61109 +1056
============================================
+ Hits 79463 80239 +776
- Misses 407593 409307 +1714
- Partials 8865 8950 +85
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
@blueorangutan package |
good finding @Pearl1594 |
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
I still think there is an underlying issue / behavioural change. Because this seems to have been working until 4.19 - this specific test fails from 4.20 |
ah ok, so some changes in 4.20 causes it ? |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13092 |
@DaanHoogland [SL] unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os are: |
@blueorangutan test ol8 xenserver-74 |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xenserver-74) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13039) |
@blueorangutan test ol8 xenserver-84 |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xenserver-84) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13044) |
@blueorangutan test ol8 xcpng76 |
@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xcpng76) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
@blueorangutan test ol8 xcpng82 |
@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xcpng82) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13062) |
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13061) |
@blueorangutan test ol8 xcpng82 |
@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xcpng82) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13069)
|
This test seems to work fine on Xen / xcp versions < 8 - Since we use centos template - which doesnt have guest tools installed, scale VM seems to fail. |
@blueorangutan package |
@Pearl1594 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13129 |
@blueorangutan test matrix |
@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (EL8 mgmt + EL8 KVM, Ubuntu22 mgmt + Ubuntu22 KVM, EL8 mgmt + VMware 7.0u3, EL9 mgmt + XCP-ng 8.2 ) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13079)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13078)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13080)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13081)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code lgtm
smoke tests look good
Description
This PR fixes consistent failure noticed on the test_scale_vm.py test suite:
#10668 (comment)
Using the centos template as the Macchinina template registered with "Other Linux (64-bit)" does not have guest_os_details for min and max dynamic memory to be used during scaling by xenserver. Which results in failure of the test as it fails to meet the constraints of
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?