Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

use new method of getting scoped vars #10751

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR... fixes a merge error on main for a removed ConfigKey method. valueInDomain(xx) -> valueIn(Scope.Domain, xx)

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.31%. Comparing base (3c75d93) to head (e3a2617).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/main/java/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java 0.00% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              main   #10751       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     3.99%   16.31%   +12.32%     
- Complexity       0    13462    +13462     
============================================
  Files          399     5676     +5277     
  Lines        32626   499384   +466758     
  Branches      5782    60394    +54612     
============================================
+ Hits          1302    81495    +80193     
- Misses       31174   408812   +377638     
- Partials       150     9077     +8927     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.99% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.18% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@weizhouapache weizhouapache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code lgtm

Copy link
Member

@vishesh92 vishesh92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@weizhouapache weizhouapache merged commit aa4718a into apache:main Apr 18, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
@vishesh92 vishesh92 deleted the mainConflictFailureScopedConfig branch April 18, 2025 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants