feat: python based catalog and schema provider #1156
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
FYI @renato2099 getting the python based providers ended up being a blocking issue for some of my work so I took a stab at implementing it. Please tell me what you think if you have some time. |
dc715fe to
2584075
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1091
Rationale for this change
This PR builds on top of #1137 and adds python based schema and catalog providers.
What changes are included in this PR?
Creates wrapper types around python based schema and catalog providers.
Adds checks for when we are going python->rust->python and short circuit to return the python original object rather than wrapper.
Adds unit test
Are there any user-facing changes?
No
Status
Leaving as draft until the following are complete: