bugfix: v0 ByteBuf should not decode by super class #6697
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #6697 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 50.81% 49.98% -0.83%
+ Complexity 5825 5734 -91
============================================
Files 1051 1051
Lines 36341 36334 -7
Branches 4321 4318 -3
============================================
- Hits 18467 18163 -304
- Misses 16014 16375 +361
+ Partials 1860 1796 -64
|
funky-eyes
reviewed
Jul 24, 2024
core/src/main/java/org/apache/seata/core/rpc/netty/v0/ProtocolDecoderV0.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
YvCeung
pushed a commit
to YvCeung/incubator-seata
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
#6696
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews