Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Update availability to be in sync with Clock/Instant/Duration #159

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2022

Conversation

phausler
Copy link
Member

This annotates proper availability for the Clock/Instant/Duration usage.

@phausler phausler requested a review from parkera June 10, 2022 18:27
@phausler
Copy link
Member Author

we should cut a tag for this after this is merged

@phausler phausler merged commit 434591a into apple:main Jun 13, 2022
@rpassis
Copy link

rpassis commented Jun 16, 2022

H there,

I just noticed this was tagged as 0.0.2 even though there are breaking changes only available for Swift >= 5.7 (we are unable to build tag 0.0.2 on Xcode 13.4.1)

In looking at the README, this section:

The Swift Async Algorithms package has a goal of being source stable as soon as possible; version numbers will follow Semantic Versioning. Source breaking changes to public API can only land in a new major version.

Should we expect these breaking changes to continue to occur until the API reaches version 1.0.0? In other words should we be pinning this package to a fixed tag until 1.0.0 is released if we want to avoid breakages in our builds?

@rpassis
Copy link

rpassis commented Jun 16, 2022

I'll answer my own question here, from https://semver.org/:

Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development. Anything MAY change at any time. The public API SHOULD NOT be considered stable.

@parkera
Copy link
Member

parkera commented Jun 16, 2022

Regardless, we may still want to revert the tag as we think about if we want 0.0.x to have this change or if it goes into 1.0. @phausler has been looking into it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants