Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 18, 2018. It is now read-only.

Conversation

halter73
Copy link
Member

Addresses #2846

@halter73 halter73 requested a review from pakrym August 24, 2018 01:56
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

This is happening now because of my change

. I think it's a bug in pipelines.

@halter73
Copy link
Member Author

@davidfowl I think you may be right. I don't actually see how the initial examined value could be used in this case.

We might want to change this pattern everywhere to only advance examine once we've actually examined the data just to be safe. What do you think about doing that @davidfowl? I could submit a new PR for this.

@halter73 halter73 closed this Aug 27, 2018
@halter73 halter73 deleted the halter73/2846 branch August 27, 2018 22:43
@halter73 halter73 restored the halter73/2846 branch August 28, 2018 17:53
@halter73
Copy link
Member Author

Reopening for investigative purposes.

@halter73 halter73 reopened this Aug 28, 2018
@halter73
Copy link
Member Author

@pakrym

@halter73 halter73 closed this Aug 28, 2018
@halter73 halter73 reopened this Aug 28, 2018
@halter73 halter73 merged commit 5ea537f into release/2.2 Aug 28, 2018
@halter73 halter73 deleted the halter73/2846 branch August 28, 2018 18:28
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants