Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[pylint] Stabilize shallow-copy-environ (PLW1507)#16627

Merged
ntBre merged 1 commit into
micha/ruff-0.10from
brent/plw1507-0.10
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

[pylint] Stabilize shallow-copy-environ (PLW1507)#16627
ntBre merged 1 commit into
micha/ruff-0.10from
brent/plw1507-0.10

Conversation

@ntBre

@ntBre ntBre commented Mar 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Stabilizes PLW1507. The tests were already in the right place, and I just tidied the docs a little bit.

Test Plan

1 issue from 2 weeks ago but just suggesting to mark the fix unsafe. The shallow vs deep copy does change the program behavior, just usually in a preferable way.

Summary
--

Stabilizes PLW1507. The tests were already in the right place, and I just tidied
the docs a little bit.

Test Plan
--

1 issue from 2 weeks ago but just suggesting to mark the fix unsafe. The shallow
vs deep copy *does* change the program behavior, just usually in a preferable
way.
@ntBre ntBre added the rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule label Mar 11, 2025
@ntBre ntBre added this to the v0.10 milestone Mar 11, 2025
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

@ntBre ntBre merged commit f1014ce into micha/ruff-0.10 Mar 11, 2025
@ntBre ntBre deleted the brent/plw1507-0.10 branch March 11, 2025 15:30
@ntBre ntBre mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2025
2 tasks
MichaReiser pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
Summary
--

Stabilizes PLW1507. The tests were already in the right place, and I
just tidied the docs a little bit.

Test Plan
--

1 issue from 2 weeks ago but just suggesting to mark the fix unsafe. The
shallow vs deep copy *does* change the program behavior, just usually in
a preferable way.
MichaReiser pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
Summary
--

Stabilizes PLW1507. The tests were already in the right place, and I
just tidied the docs a little bit.

Test Plan
--

1 issue from 2 weeks ago but just suggesting to mark the fix unsafe. The
shallow vs deep copy *does* change the program behavior, just usually in
a preferable way.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants