-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Pei's ultimate test #268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: automation
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Pei's ultimate test #268
Conversation
HackerOne Code Security Review🟢 Scan Complete: 22 Issue(s) Here's how the code changes were interpreted and info about the tools used for scanning. 📖 Summary of ChangesThe summaries indicate modifications across several Rust and TypeScript files in the next-api, next-core, and next-taskless crates, as well as an example project. The changes predominantly introduce potentially unsafe code patterns, including hardcoded secrets, memory manipulation, integer overflows, and insecure file operations. Most modifications appear to be experimental or demonstrative, with one file (graphql.ts) remaining unchanged.
ℹ️ Issues DetectedNOTE: These may not require action! Below are unvalidated results from the Analysis Tools that ran during the latest scan for transparency. We investigate each of these for accuracy and relevance before surfacing them as a potential problem. How will I know if something is a problem?
🧰 Analysis tools
|
Derek T (with large name for testing) has submitted feedback.
Reviewed with ❤️ by PullRequest |
|
||
pub fn simulate_insecure_patterns(&self) { | ||
// 1. Hardcoded secret | ||
const HARDCODED_PASSWORD: &str = "P@ssw0rd123"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ISSUE: AI Security Review (Severity: High)
Hardcoded password 'P@ssw0rd123' exposed in source code. This credential could be extracted by attackers with access to the codebase or compiled binaries. Remove hardcoded credentials and use secure configuration management or environment variables instead.
Remediation:
Just testing things on staging here... Please ignore
🤖 powered by PullRequest Automation 👋 verified by Derek T (with large name for testing)
Due to inactivity, PullRequest has cancelled this review job. You can reactivate the code review job from the PullRequest dashboard. |
No description provided.