LGTM!

I should mention that when I first wrote stuff, I mainly used .es because I thought that .js was ‘claimed’ by the default def and thought that if I used it, it might create collision problems somewhere. I also wasn’t really aware of most of the things that are sensitive to these suffixes. In practice, it’s absences of .js that have led to interop issues a few times, so I likely made the wrong choice.

I don’t know for sure that dropping .es in favor of having .js only would be safe now, but if you think it would make stuff simpler and that it would be safe, maybe it’d be worth it?

LGTM! Thanks @blake-regalia 🎉