Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Make IPFS offline (private) for standalone installation #66

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 7, 2021
Merged

Make IPFS offline (private) for standalone installation #66

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 7, 2021

Conversation

dm3ch
Copy link
Contributor

@dm3ch dm3ch commented Sep 2, 2021

/close #25

@dm3ch dm3ch mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2021
Closed
@dm3ch dm3ch changed the title Private ipfs Make IPFS offline (private) for standalone installation Sep 3, 2021
@dm3ch dm3ch marked this pull request as draft September 3, 2021 00:13
@dm3ch dm3ch marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2021 00:58
@dm3ch dm3ch requested a review from zaslavskii September 3, 2021 00:59
@dm3ch dm3ch mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2021
Merged
zaslavskii
zaslavskii approved these changes Sep 7, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@zaslavskii zaslavskii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's create a separate task to migrate to external chart.

@zaslavskii zaslavskii merged commit 0ca7b0c into main Sep 7, 2021
@zaslavskii zaslavskii deleted the private-ipfs branch September 7, 2021 16:11
@dm3ch dm3ch mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@zaslavskii zaslavskii zaslavskii approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Migrate to Nebulus instead of IPFS or use offline ipfs.
2 participants
@dm3ch @zaslavskii