Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

fix: update references to SHA hash to SHA-1 in course definition file #143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

fix: update references to SHA hash to SHA-1 in course definition file #143

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025

Conversation

andy1li
Copy link
Member

@andy1li andy1li commented Apr 25, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified all references to "SHA hash" by specifying "SHA-1 hash" throughout the course content, ensuring consistent and accurate terminology regarding Git object hashes.

@andy1li andy1li self-assigned this Apr 25, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes update textual references throughout the course content to clarify that all mentions of "SHA hash" specifically refer to "SHA-1 hash." This affects descriptions of various Git commands and internal object representations, ensuring consistent and accurate terminology. No functional, logical, or structural changes are made; the updates are limited to improved specificity in documentation and explanations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
course-definition.yml Updated all references from "SHA hash" to "SHA-1 hash" in descriptions of Git commands and concepts.

Poem

In the warren where hashes abound,
We’ve made it clear, so truth is found.
No more vague “SHA” in our den,
It’s “SHA-1” from now on, my friend!
With every commit, tree, and blob,
Precision’s the name of our rabbit job.
🐇✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f0495db and dfd3ee4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • course-definition.yml (9 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (kotlin)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (haskell)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
course-definition.yml (11)

350-351: Clarify SHA algorithm in git hash-object description

The description now explicitly specifies “SHA-1” instead of a generic “SHA,” which improves clarity about which algorithm is used.

359-359: Update comment for computing and writing blob hash

The inline example comment now correctly refers to computing the “SHA-1 hash” before writing the object, aligning with the surrounding text.

420-420: Specify output format uses SHA-1 hash

The test bullet now clearly states that your program should print a “40-character SHA-1 hash,” removing any ambiguity around the hash length and algorithm.

425-427: Clarify SHA-1 hashing requirements in blob processing notes

The notes bullets correctly reference “SHA-1 hash” and outline that hashing is done over the uncompressed header + content, reinforcing the exact computation steps.

451-451: Clarify tree entry identifier algorithm

This bullet now specifies that entries use a “SHA-1 hash” to point to blob or tree objects, ensuring consistency with the rest of the course material.

609-609: Clarify internal representation of tree object hashes

The note now explicitly mentions “SHA-1 hashes are raw bytes (20 bytes long), not hexadecimal,” which prevents confusion about the format stored on disk.

648-648: Clarify output hash format for git write-tree

The description now specifies the “40-char SHA-1 hash” returned by git write-tree, aligning with other command explanations.

653-654: Specify SHA-1 hash recording for tree entries

These bullets correctly reference “SHA-1 hash” when describing how to record blob and tree entries, maintaining precise terminology.

716-716: Specify printed hash format for git write-tree

The instruction now makes clear that your implementation should “print the 40-char SHA-1 hash to stdout,” matching the expected output.

791-791: Clarify output hash format for git commit-tree

This sentence now clearly indicates that git commit-tree outputs a “40-char SHA-1 hash,” ensuring consistency with previous stages.

801-801: Specify printed hash format for commit objects

The requirement now explicitly states to “print its 40-char SHA-1 hash to stdout,” which aligns the user’s implementation with the tester’s expectations.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@andy1li andy1li merged commit 97b5ce9 into main Apr 25, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@andy1li andy1li

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@andy1li