Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

feat: support bundle: scan netcheck output for issues #12164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
Tracked by #12160
johnstcn opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #12160

feat: support bundle: scan netcheck output for issues #12164

johnstcn opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@johnstcn

Comments

@johnstcn
Copy link
Member

johnstcn commented Feb 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Part of #12160

Netcheck output includes free-form logs e.g.

            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1000stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (b85c176639900df588044cc2) in 1.47293ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1000stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (9e356427750ad7f1bb0254b1) in 1.46937ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1000stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (2b3435aea422c94a945af804) in 1.4651ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1002stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (5c7156f0326cb8cd7d1f290a) in 102.771129ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1002stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (a45a1153c719cb7ed469c05c) in 102.775739ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1002stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (ecba6efa3c74979d49df8281) in 102.679969ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1001stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (057ec0ef2b6bee8e9ab3159a) in 101.754019ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1001stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (079610d9367690769b592aa1) in 101.726159ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1001stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (345b9e9546a81ca3659c2995) in 101.680899ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1004stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (137d5370f82ba19d1ae64fc2) in 101.284749ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1004stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (bc7641d0d08130c2af56ff0c) in 101.287159ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1004stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (86fdfc14dfe6b661b876d728) in 101.295189ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1003stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (0f64f5050a1ce1e2ca1bdea9) in 92.08526ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1003stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (a30c88fec49c0fff3b688c86) in 92.101659ms",
            "netcheck: netcheck.runProbe: got STUN response for 1003stun0 from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 (29831d854073cf77641cb4e2) in 92.031119ms",
            "netcheck: [v1] measuring ICMP latency of coder_johannesburg-fly (10018): no address for node 10018a",
            "netcheck: [v1] measuring ICMP latency of coder_sydney-fly (10015): no address for node 10015a",
            "netcheck: [v1] measuring ICMP latency of coder (999): no address for node 999b",
            "netcheck: [v1] measuring ICMP latency of coder_paris-fly (10013): no address for node 10013a",
            "netcheck: [v1] measuring ICMP latency of coder_sao-paulo-fly (10016): no address for node 10016a",
            "netcheck: [v1] report: udp=true v6=false v6os=false mapvarydest=false hair=false portmap= v4a=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:33037 derp=999 derpdist=999v4:0s,10013v4:250ms,10015v4:360ms,10016v4:336ms,10018v4:657ms"

and also any errors encountered running netcheck (netcheck_err).

Scan these logs for potential issues and include in report.
@johnstcn johnstcn mentioned this issue Feb 15, 2024
Closed
8 tasks
@cdr-bot cdr-bot bot added the feature label Feb 15, 2024
@johnstcn
Copy link
Member Author

Scanning free-form logs will be error-prone and we currently don't know exactly what we're looking for. I'm going to close this issue out for now and we can reopen later once we know if there are any specific things we need to look for.

@johnstcn johnstcn closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@johnstcn johnstcn

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@johnstcn