@tjcran I originally marked this for Community (see the epic associated too). When do we expect customers will want this? Community? Later?

Hey team! Please add your planning poker estimate with ZenHub @kylecarbs @deansheather

@tjcran I originally marked this for Community (see the epic associated too). When do we expect customers will want this? Community? Later?

We are not planning for Terminal Sharing until Enterprise at the earliest. I'm also not clear on why resizing is a blocker for sharing. I'm going to bump this one to Enterprise as well. If it happens earlier, great. But definitely a nice to have for launch.

Resizing is a blocker for sharing because having two windows "attached" to the same terminal with different sizes will cause issues right now.

Resizing is a blocker for sharing because having two windows "attached" to the same terminal with different sizes will cause issues right now.

@deansheather Got it, thanks! Either way, I'm leaving this as "Enterprise MVP" for now, but it will potentially even come after that.

@tjcran I think this should be closed and rolled up into the master issue since the terminal would be unusable without smart resizing.

I'm not convinced this is a blocker. It requires that the user have two windows attached to the same terminal of different sizes. How do they even get into that situation?

I'm not convinced this is a blocker. It requires that the user have two windows attached to the same terminal of different sizes. How do they even get into that situation?

It's about the host window not the TTY. The TTY will always be the same size.

@ketang they could copy + paste the URL for their web terminal, but it's certainly weird and shouldn't be a blocker.