ci: reduce maxWorkers in jest tests #1006
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: This spot has caused slowdowns locally. This PR is an investigation (to trigger CI) to see if reducing maxWorkers speeds up test/js.
|
This alongside #1005 should chop off a few minutes from |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1006 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 66.90% 66.79% -0.11%
==========================================
Files 253 253
Lines 14941 14941
Branches 135 135
==========================================
- Hits 9996 9980 -16
- Misses 3950 3963 +13
- Partials 995 998 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
When
maxWorkersis high, there's a bug injestthat causes OOM kills.Unfortunately, CI is experiencing this as well as local. For now, the best solution
is just reducing
maxWorkers.Resolves: #1004