Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

feat: add dismissed property to the healthcheck section #10940

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

mtojek
Copy link
Member

@mtojek mtojek commented Nov 29, 2023

Fixes: #10712

The last part of backend implementation. The dismissed property is present in everyhealth check section.

@mtojek mtojek self-assigned this Nov 29, 2023
@mtojek mtojek changed the title feat: include dismissed property in a healthcheck section feat: add dismissed property to the healthcheck section Nov 29, 2023
@mtojek mtojek marked this pull request as ready for review November 29, 2023 14:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@BrunoQuaresma BrunoQuaresma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FE looks good!

Copy link
Member

@johnstcn johnstcn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, some comments but nothing blocking. 👍

Comment on lines +411 to 436
dismissedHealthchecks := loadDismissedHealthchecks(ctx, options.Database, options.Logger)
return healthcheck.Run(ctx, &healthcheck.ReportOptions{
Database: healthcheck.DatabaseReportOptions{
DB: options.Database,
Threshold: options.DeploymentValues.Healthcheck.ThresholdDatabase.Value(),
Dismissed: slices.Contains(dismissedHealthchecks, healthcheck.SectionDatabase),
},
Websocket: healthcheck.WebsocketReportOptions{
AccessURL: options.AccessURL,
APIKey: apiKey,
Dismissed: slices.Contains(dismissedHealthchecks, healthcheck.SectionWebsocket),
},
AccessURL: healthcheck.AccessURLReportOptions{
AccessURL: options.AccessURL,
Dismissed: slices.Contains(dismissedHealthchecks, healthcheck.SectionAccessURL),
},
DerpHealth: derphealth.ReportOptions{
DERPMap: api.DERPMap(),
DERPMap: api.DERPMap(),
Dismissed: slices.Contains(dismissedHealthchecks, healthcheck.SectionDERP),
},
WorkspaceProxy: healthcheck.WorkspaceProxyReportOptions{
CurrentVersion: buildinfo.Version(),
WorkspaceProxiesFetchUpdater: *(options.WorkspaceProxiesFetchUpdater).Load(),
Dismissed: slices.Contains(dismissedHealthchecks, healthcheck.SectionWorkspaceProxy),
},
})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

non-blocking: this anonymous function is getting a bit heavy-weight and could probably use a refactor of some sort.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack

@mtojek mtojek enabled auto-merge (squash) November 29, 2023 16:29
@mtojek mtojek merged commit 2b574e2 into main Nov 29, 2023
@mtojek mtojek deleted the 10712-api-health-settings-dismissed branch November 29, 2023 16:37
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

health check: dismiss warning
3 participants