Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@EdwardAngert
Copy link
Contributor

We do not use Tailscale (product) but instead import Tailscale OSS libraries which has some nice ways of handling Wireguard. We also use Tailscale's logo in our architecture, but calling it only Tailscale seems to throw people off when they're considering Coder and how it works.

I've left it wherever it seems to make sense (such as when we talk about DERP), and sprinkled some Wireguard and websocket/HTTPS where I could

@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert added the docs Area: coder.com/docs label Dec 17, 2024
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert requested a review from bpmct December 17, 2024 16:59
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert changed the title docs: add wireguard context to some places where we say tailscale docs: add context for wireguard in places referencing tailscale Dec 17, 2024
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert enabled auto-merge (squash) December 17, 2024 17:57
for both public and [offline deployments](../../install/offline.md).

However, Tailscale has graciously allowed us to use
However, our Wireguard integration through Tailscale has graciously allowed us
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think we can rephrase to:

However, by integrating with Wireguard, Tailscale has graciously...

@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert merged commit bcb15aa into main Dec 17, 2024
26 checks passed
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert deleted the tailscale-wireguard branch December 17, 2024 20:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

docs Area: coder.com/docs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants