-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 925
fix(agent): start devcontainers through agentcontainers package #18471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Fixes coder/internal#706 Context for the implementation here coder/internal#706 (comment) Synchronously starts dev containers defined in terraform with our `DevcontainerCLI` abstraction, instead of piggybacking off of our `agentscripts` package. This gives us more control over logs, instead of being reliant on packages which may or may not exist in the user-provided image.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR refactors how devcontainers are started by splitting out the devcontainer CLI functionality from the agentscripts package. Key changes include removing post start scripts from agentscripts, updating tests to reference new expected outputs and behavior, and updating the API to synchronously trigger devcontainer creation via a new CreateDevcontainer method.
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
File | Description |
---|---|
agent/agentscripts/agentscripts_test.go | Removed tests for post-start scripts and updated expectations. |
agent/agentscripts/agentscripts.go | Refactored to remove runnerScript and post start script logic. |
agent/agentcontainers/testdata/devcontainercli/parse/up.expected | Updated expected log output for devcontainer CLI. |
agent/agentcontainers/devcontainercli_test.go | Updated test file references to expected log output file. |
agent/agentcontainers/devcontainercli.go | Updated option defaults and logging writer behavior. |
agent/agentcontainers/devcontainer_test.go | Entire file removed, reflecting changes in devcontainer handling. |
agent/agentcontainers/devcontainer.go | Removed devcontainer script extraction helper functions. |
agent/agentcontainers/api.go | Modified recreateDevcontainer to return errors and added CreateDevcontainer. |
agent/agent.go | Removed legacy handling of experimental devcontainers and added calls to containerAPI.CreateDevcontainer. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
@@ -401,6 +408,7 @@ func (l *devcontainerCLILogWriter) Write(p []byte) (n int, err error) { | |||
} | |||
if logLine.Level >= 3 { | |||
l.logger.Info(l.ctx, "@devcontainer/cli", slog.F("line", string(line))) | |||
_, _ = l.writer.Write([]byte(logLine.Text + "\n")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be beneficial to check the error returned by l.writer.Write rather than ignoring it. Handling any potential write failure could improve the reliability of the logging.
_, _ = l.writer.Write([]byte(logLine.Text + "\n")) | |
if _, err := l.writer.Write([]byte(logLine.Text + "\n")); err != nil { | |
l.logger.Error(l.ctx, "failed to write to log writer", slog.Error(err), slog.F("text", logLine.Text)) | |
} |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cursory glance looks good! 👍🏻
Couple of notes (in addition to inline comments):
- Testing, this could be done in
agent_test.go
for e.g. autostart integration test - A
api_test.go
to testCreateDevcontainer
behavior - (Re-introduce agent script timing for autostart of devcontainer, not critical for GA, but perhaps track via ticket or if simple a follow-up PR.)
agent/agent.go
Outdated
|
||
if cAPI := a.containerAPI.Load(); cAPI != nil { | ||
for _, dc := range manifest.Devcontainers { | ||
err = errors.Join(err, cAPI.CreateDevcontainer(dc)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's a good idea to do these sync so we avoid potential Docker concurrency races, it'd be nice if it was asynchronous but let's go with this!
// have not been enabled, a warning will be surfaced in the agent logs. | ||
script.RunOnStart = false | ||
return script | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yay!!!
}) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good bye my beautiful hack! 👋🏻
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Largely looks good, but I still have some concerns with initialization order of the containers API (see comment). Ideally it would be initialized early, like e.g. SSH server, then the race could be avoided.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few more suggestions but we're real close now, nice work!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome! Let's try this out in dogfood and if everything seems OK, cherry-pick it in 💪🏻
agent/agentcontainers/api.go
Outdated
dc, found := api.knownDevcontainers[workspaceFolder] | ||
if !found { | ||
api.mu.Unlock() | ||
return xerrors.Errorf("no devcontainer found") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
return xerrors.Errorf("no devcontainer found") | |
return xerrors.Errorf("devcontainer not found") |
Minor: Just a slightly different signal to not suggest there isn't a single devcontainer.
Fixes coder/internal#706
Context for the implementation here
coder/internal#706 (comment)
Synchronously starts dev containers defined in terraform with our
DevcontainerCLI
abstraction, instead of piggybacking off of ouragentscripts
package. This gives us more control over logs, instead of being reliant on packages which may or may not exist in the user-provided image.