fix: Skip waiting for exit output in SSH test #3368
Merged
+1
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This seems to have caused flakes on Windows, the reason could be that the input is lost due to writing to stdin before the shell is ready, or simply that the command wasn't echoed (for the same reason). We no longer need to consume the output since #2122 has been fixed, so this might remove the flake in the latter case. Ideally we would wait for the prompt to be present, but since we are spawning the users shell, we have no control of what the prompt looks like. In CI we can make assumption but even then it could change in the future.
johnstcn
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This seems to have caused flakes on Windows, the reason could be that
the input is lost due to writing to stdin before the shell is ready, or
simply that the command wasn't echoed (for the same reason).
We no longer need to consume the output since #2122 has been fixed, so
this might remove the flake in the latter case.
Ideally we would wait for the prompt to be present, but since we are
spawning the users shell, we have no control of what the prompt looks
like. In CI we can make assumption but even then it could change in the
future.