-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 904
feat: use JWT ticket to avoid DB queries on apps #6148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cd239fa
feat: use JWT ticket to avoid DB queries on apps
deansheather 24d1112
get existing tests working
deansheather 8ffd8d4
progress
deansheather a392635
progress
deansheather e60c645
working session tickets
deansheather e681f4c
progress
deansheather 16cf790
Merge branch 'main' into dean/app-tickets
deansheather 22707c6
chore: move workspace apps auth code to new package
deansheather 3521669
fixup! chore: move workspace apps auth code to new package
deansheather bffd775
chore: tests for workspace apps auth ticket code
deansheather b8a5526
chore: update RSA private key to avoid typos
deansheather e0e4237
Merge branch 'main' into dean/app-tickets
deansheather f236a14
chore: change app ticket algo to symmetric
deansheather 189eecf
chore: PR comments
deansheather df6a9e5
Merge branch 'main' into dean/app-tickets
deansheather 9c40076
chore: avoid ExtractAPIKey middleware in apps auth
deansheather f16609f
Merge branch 'main' into dean/app-tickets
deansheather 45f38bc
fixup! Merge branch 'main' into dean/app-tickets
deansheather File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be protected or use sync.Map? Otherwise we may have concurrent map read/writes between goroutines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't expect a transaction to be used concurrently from two places at once (and I don't think that even works anyways) but I can add this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For example, the lock on the underlying data struct is replaced with a noop lock in a tx, so concurrent database read/writes may panic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've actually decided against this for the above reason.