Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

fix: Workflow does not contain permissions #140

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2025
Merged

fix: Workflow does not contain permissions #140

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2025

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Sep 4, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Potential fix for https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/security/code-scanning/2

To fix this problem, add a permissions block to the workflow to restrict the GITHUB_TOKEN's privileges to the minimal level necessary. Since the workflow is primarily a pre-commit check (likely only needs to read repository contents), the best starting point is contents: read. If additional privileges are confirmed to be required (e.g., opening/modifying PRs), those can be added as needed.

This change should be made at the root level of .github/workflows/pre-commit.yml, immediately after the workflow name: line but before on:. No additional imports or definitions are required, just a direct YAML addition.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the GitHub Actions workflow for “Run pre-commit” to explicitly set GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to contents: read.
    • Adjusts the default token scope for this workflow to read-only access to repository contents.
    • Triggers and jobs remain unchanged; this is a configuration-only update.
    • No impact on application features or user experience.

@shenxianpeng @github-advanced-security
fix: Workflow does not contain permissions
76b7bc4 
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

A permissions block was added to the GitHub Actions workflow "Run pre-commit," setting GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to contents: read. No triggers or job definitions were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow permissions
.\.github\workflows\pre-commit.yml		 Added top-level permissions: with contents: read to restrict default GITHUB_TOKEN scope; no other workflow changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

I twitch my ears at YAML’s creed,
A token tamed to only read.
Hop-hop through checks, I swiftly pass,
Least privilege nibbled in the grass.
Pipelines purr, no needless grant—
Secure and snug, I thump, “Enchant!”

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 857cc3c and 76b7bc4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pre-commit.yml (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bugfix/alert-autofix-2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 2: Workflow does not contain permissions fix: Workflow does not contain permissions Sep 4, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Commit-Check ✔️

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2025 01:27
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2025 01:28
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit 3cc934c into main Sep 4, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the bugfix/alert-autofix-2 branch September 4, 2025 01:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip-changelog
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@shenxianpeng