Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Pin Go 1.26.6 in mise.toml - #433

Merged
pedronauck merged 1 commit into
compozy:mainfrom
nobrega-tech:patch-1
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

Pin Go 1.26.6 in mise.toml#433
pedronauck merged 1 commit into
compozy:mainfrom
nobrega-tech:patch-1

Conversation

@nobrega-tech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pin Go version in mise.toml

What & why

Pins Go 1.26.6 in the repository's mise.toml.

Without a repository-local Go version, running Go commands through Mise could fail with:

mise ERROR No version is set for shim: go
Set a global default version with one of the following:
mise use -g [email protected]
mise use -g [email protected]

This was encountered when running:

go build -o ./bin/compozy .

Adding Go to [tools] ensures contributors using Mise get the expected Go version from the repository configuration instead of requiring a global Mise configuration.

How you verified it

Re-ran:

go build -o ./bin/compozy .

after adding:

go = "1.26.6"

to mise.toml.

Mise now resolves the repository-local Go version instead of failing with No version is set for shim: go, allowing the build to proceed.

No tests were added because this change only fixes the development toolchain configuration and does not introduce or modify application behavior.

Impact

No runtime, CLI interface, HTTP/UDS route, config.toml, or web surface impact.

This only affects local development environments using Mise by ensuring the Go toolchain is configured by the repository.

No documentation update is required.


  • make gate passes locally (make gate-full before review on larger changes)
  • New or changed behavior is covered by tests, or I explained above why not
  • If an agent wrote or co-wrote this, I named it above and verified the result myself

Pin Go version in mise.toml
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nobrega-tech is attempting to deploy a commit to the Compozy Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • mise.toml is excluded by !**/*.toml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 1bd616ad-057e-469f-8d1c-da6ecf13c031

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

Pins Go 1.26.6 in the repository’s Mise configuration so contributors using Mise can resolve a repository-local Go toolchain.

  • Adds go = "1.26.6" to the existing [tools] table.
  • Does not alter application runtime behavior or public interfaces.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge because the new patch-level Go pin is compatible with the repository’s Go 1.26.4 minimum and introduces no demonstrated failure.

The change only supplies a repository-local Mise toolchain version, and the available repository evidence establishes no broken build, workflow, or runtime contract.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
mise.toml Adds a valid Go 1.26.6 toolchain pin; no actionable defect was identified.

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "chore(mise): pin Go 1.26.6" | Re-trigger Greptile

@pedronauck
pedronauck merged commit 6407c61 into compozy:main Aug 19, 2026
2 of 4 checks passed
This was referenced Aug 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants