Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

setuptools v78.0.1#384

Closed
regro-cf-autotick-bot wants to merge 2 commits into
conda-forge:mainfrom
regro-cf-autotick-bot:78.0.1_h451635
Closed

setuptools v78.0.1#384
regro-cf-autotick-bot wants to merge 2 commits into
conda-forge:mainfrom
regro-cf-autotick-bot:78.0.1_h451635

Conversation

@regro-cf-autotick-bot

@regro-cf-autotick-bot regro-cf-autotick-bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It is very likely that the current package version for this feedstock is out of date.

Checklist before merging this PR:

  • Dependencies have been updated if changed: see upstream
  • Tests have passed
  • Updated license if changed and license_file is packaged

Information about this PR:

  1. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.
  2. The bot will almost always only open one PR per version.
  3. The bot will stop issuing PRs if more than 3 version bump PRs generated by the bot are open. If you don't want to package a particular version please close the PR.
  4. If you want these PRs to be merged automatically, make an issue with @conda-forge-admin,please add bot automerge in the title and merge the resulting PR. This command will add our bot automerge feature to your feedstock.
  5. If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

Closes: #378
Closes: #380
Closes: #383

Dependency Analysis

Please note that this analysis is highly experimental. The aim here is to make maintenance easier by inspecting the package's dependencies. Importantly this analysis does not support optional dependencies, please double check those before making changes. If you do not want hinting of this kind ever please add bot: inspection: disabled to your conda-forge.yml. If you encounter issues with this feature please ping the bot team conda-forge/bot.

Analysis by grayskull shows a discrepancy between it and the the package's stated requirements in the meta.yaml.

Packages found by grayskull but not in the meta.yaml:

  • pip
  • python >=3.9

Packages found in the meta.yaml but not found by grayskull:

  • python 3.9

This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/14040132975 - please use this URL for debugging.

@conda-forge-admin

conda-forge-admin commented Mar 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ noarch: python recipes should usually follow the syntax in our documentation for specifying the Python version.
    • For the test.requires section of recipe, you should usually use python {{ python_min }} for the python entry.
    • If the package requires a newer Python version than the currently supported minimum version on conda-forge, you can override the python_min variable by adding a Jinja2 set statement at the top of your recipe (or using an equivalent context variable for v1 recipes).

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/14040325643. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

rgommers
rgommers requested changes Mar 25, 2025
View reviewed changes

@rgommers rgommers left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

78.0 has a massive breaking change in it: pypa/setuptools#4870. Adding this blocking review to make sure this doesn't get merged any time soon.

@rgommers

rgommers commented Mar 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixed through a revert in the upcoming 78.0.2 (pypa/setuptools@a219451). There's a serious issue in setuptools development right now though, there's major breaking changes every few days.

@thewchan thewchan mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2025
Open
3 tasks
@bollwyvl

bollwyvl commented Apr 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is 78.1.0 better? If so, perhaps closing PRs not intended to be merged (this, #380, #383, #384) would let the bot propose it...

@rgommers

rgommers commented Apr 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yep, 78.1.0 does look better. The bot usually has no trouble opening new PRs, but let's try it.

@rgommers rgommers closed this Apr 3, 2025
@rgommers

rgommers commented Apr 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If it doesn't open it automatically, I'll try it manually tomorrow.

@rgommers

rgommers commented Apr 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

78.1.0 is now available after gh-385

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rgommers rgommers rgommers requested changes

@isuruf isuruf Awaiting requested review from isuruf isuruf is a code owner

@jakirkham jakirkham Awaiting requested review from jakirkham jakirkham is a code owner

@msarahan msarahan Awaiting requested review from msarahan msarahan is a code owner

@nicoddemus nicoddemus Awaiting requested review from nicoddemus nicoddemus is a code owner

@ocefpaf ocefpaf Awaiting requested review from ocefpaf ocefpaf is a code owner

@xhochy xhochy Awaiting requested review from xhochy xhochy is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@regro-cf-autotick-bot @conda-forge-admin @rgommers @bollwyvl