Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Add missing code block ending in the docs #368

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Add missing code block ending in the docs #368

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2025

Conversation

AlexVPopov
Copy link
Contributor

@AlexVPopov AlexVPopov commented Aug 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What this does

In the docs, there is a missing code block ending, see this. The PR adds it.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation
  • Performance improvement

Scope check

  • I read the Contributing Guide
  • This aligns with RubyLLM's focus on LLM communication
  • This isn't application-specific logic that belongs in user code
  • This benefits most users, not just my specific use case

Quality check

  • I ran overcommit --install and all hooks pass
  • I tested my changes thoroughly
  • I updated documentation if needed
  • I didn't modify auto-generated files manually (models.json, aliases.json)

API changes

  • Breaking change
  • New public methods/classes
  • Changed method signatures
  • No API changes

Related issues

@AlexVPopov AlexVPopov changed the title Add missing code block ending Add missing code block ending in the docs Aug 25, 2025
@crmne crmne merged commit c4df27f into crmne:main Aug 26, 2025
@crmne
Copy link
Owner

crmne commented Aug 26, 2025

Thank you for catching this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@crmne crmne crmne approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@AlexVPopov @crmne