Implement cupy.linalg.cond#9140
Merged
Merged
Conversation
added 6 commits
May 24, 2025 19:13
* Basic testcases present * add for_parameters for parametrizing test methods with general parameters
Contributor
|
This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it @gronerl? 🙏 |
86 tasks
Member
|
/test mini |
added 2 commits
May 31, 2025 09:05
…ly due to parameterize decorator.)
Author
|
Thanks for reviewing @kmaehashi , PR is updated as suggested. |
Author
|
(Sorry, closing was a slip of the finger.) |
kmaehashi
approved these changes
May 31, 2025
Member
|
Thanks, LGTM! |
Member
|
/test skip |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I'm Linus, making a maiden PR to cupy!
This PR adds the numpy.linalg.cond function to cupy. The implementation follows closely what numpy does and I did my best to add tests for all the relevant test cases in numpy.
Some points to consider by the reviewer: