Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

DEV: Split plugin core features system tests into a seperate workflow #32661

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tgxworld
Copy link
Contributor

@tgxworld tgxworld commented May 9, 2025

The plugin system tests job is taking too long to run after core
features system tests were added to all official plugins. Therefore, we
are splitting out the plugin core features system tests into another
workflow so that more tests are ran concurrently.

There is also no need to split out chat system tests from plugin system
tests anymore since the plugin core features system tests is now the
bottleneck and not chat system tests.

@tgxworld tgxworld force-pushed the split_core_features_plugin_system_tests_into_own_workflow branch 9 times, most recently from 1f02854 to ce8784c Compare May 9, 2025 11:46
tgxworld added a commit to discourse/.github that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
@tgxworld tgxworld force-pushed the split_core_features_plugin_system_tests_into_own_workflow branch 2 times, most recently from fcf692c to 2890a9a Compare May 9, 2025 12:22
The `plugin system tests` job is taking too long to run after core
features system tests were added to all official plugins. Therefore, we
are splitting out the plugin core features system tests into another
workflow so that more tests are ran concurrently.

There is also no need to split out chat system tests from plugin system
tests anymore since the plugin core features system tests is now the
bottleneck..
@tgxworld tgxworld force-pushed the split_core_features_plugin_system_tests_into_own_workflow branch from 2890a9a to 3e6d07a Compare May 9, 2025 23:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant