-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
extend RSA results by selection of Envelope #389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
extend RSA results by selection of Envelope #389
Conversation
I see you're using Happy to help you setup Together with |
…sing-spectralanalysismembersinternalforces-for-different-envelopes-not-possible
When is this going to be released to pypi? |
@MaximilianFranz It should be now available in pypi, so please try it and let us know your feedback |
Thanks - will do! |
So we tried this on the latest RFEM version (6.07.0004) and the latest installation from "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\python.exe" C:\core-v2\scripts\read_rfem_seismic_results.py
Bitte die ID (Nummer) des Lastfalls Antwortspektrenverfahren eingeben (Bsp: 6): 4
Connecting to server...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\core-v2\scripts\read_rfem_seismic_results.py", line 47, in <module>
x_env = RFEMSeismicResults.read_from_model(
File "C:\core-v2\src\md_core\export\rfem.py", line 1128, in read_from_model
member_inner_forces = ResultTables.SpectralAnalysisMembersInternalForces(
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\RFEM\Results\resultTables.py", line 1990, in SpectralAnalysisMembersInternalForces
results = model.clientModel.service.get_results_for_spectral_analysis_members_internal_forces(
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\client.py", line 559, in __call__
return client.invoke(args, kwargs)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\client.py", line 612, in invoke
soapenv = binding.get_message(self.method, args, kwargs)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\bindings\binding.py", line 120, in get_message
content = self.bodycontent(method, args, kwargs)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\bindings\document.py", line 64, in bodycontent
p = self.mkparam(method, pd, value)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\bindings\document.py", line 106, in mkparam
return Binding.mkparam(self, method, pdef, object)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\bindings\binding.py", line 289, in mkparam
return marshaller.process(content)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\mx\core.py", line 60, in process
self.append(document, content)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\mx\core.py", line 73, in append
self.appender.append(parent, content)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\mx\appender.py", line 102, in append
appender.append(parent, content)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\mx\appender.py", line 243, in append
Appender.append(self, child, cont)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\mx\appender.py", line 182, in append
self.marshaller.append(parent, content)
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\mx\core.py", line 72, in append
if self.start(content):
File "C:\Users\Lena Ebert\miniconda3\envs\modugen-core-2\lib\site-packages\suds\mx\literal.py", line 87, in start
raise TypeNotFound(content.tag)
suds.TypeNotFound: Type not found: 'envelope_type' and the RFEM logs say:
which tells me the last line of our code ( But it fails quitely / hard without any hint as to what happened server-side. |
Good afteroon, @MaximilianFranz, |
Has the fix on the server side made it into the release? We |
Hi @MaximilianFranz |
@TomasPail @OndraMichal |
Hi all, @TomasPail and @jlemeriel - yes the issue persists for us. We cannot access We still get A fix here would be highly appreciated for us to keep moving forward! Thanks |
Description
Add possibility to select an Envelope in Spectral analysis results
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Extended example DynamicAnalysis.py
Test Configuration:
Checklist: