Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@georglauterbach
Copy link
Member

@georglauterbach georglauterbach commented Mar 22, 2024

Description

I came across this visualization recently and found it neat; it gives users an idea of how well this project is actually maintained, and it looks nice. It's not something super important; if you think it does not fit well into the project, or you have other good reasons to reject it, please let me know - I don't mind seeing this rejected, just wanted to bring it up.

Under the hood, we're using Axiom.


Here is the link to the branch: https://github.com/docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver/tree/git-statistics

Here is what it looks like:

git_stats

Type of change

  • This change is a documentation update

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

I came across this visualization recently and found it neat; it gives users an idea of how well this project is actually maintained and it looks nice.
@georglauterbach georglauterbach added kind/improvement Improve an existing feature, configuration file or the documentation area/documentation labels Mar 22, 2024
@georglauterbach georglauterbach self-assigned this Mar 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@polarathene polarathene left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think most of that is already presented by the repo "Insights" tab? This is just a nicer visual summary?

I'm fine with it, but I don't know if it provides much value to users in the README 🤷‍♂️

@georglauterbach
Copy link
Member Author

It's nothing completely new, indeed, just a nice visual presentation.

@casperklein
Copy link
Member

I am not sure if these stats are correct. I noticed the top contributors jpsanchezl10 and UltraCoderRU. jpsanchezl10 opened an issue in 2023 and for UltraCoderRU I couldn't find anything at all. Do I miss something here?

@polarathene
Copy link
Member

polarathene commented Mar 23, 2024

UltraCoderRU I couldn't find anything at all

The CONTRIBUTORS.md isn't too helpful at times with how sort order shuffles between updates 🤷‍♂️

The user was listed in the file though, and searching for them on PR history with author:UltraCoderRU does provide this:

No PRs for jpsanchezl10, only 3 issues raised.


image

So yeah that is odd and misleading.

I personally don't find value in the metric, similar to how commit frequency / size doesn't convey much (since before we adopted squash merge for PRs that was a common factor for "top" contributors ranking in the past).

@georglauterbach
Copy link
Member Author

That's odd, I agree. I don't like when something like this is there right from the start.

@georglauterbach georglauterbach deleted the git-statistics branch March 24, 2024 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/documentation kind/improvement Improve an existing feature, configuration file or the documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants