• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 042836c and 3f09b18.

• apps/client/src/ee/security/pages/security.tsx (1 hunks)

apps/client/src/ee/security/pages/security.tsx (1)

22-24: Now I need to verify the actual codebase implementation and check if there's server-side protection in place:

Based on my verification through web research and code analysis, I can now generate the final rewritten review comment. The web search confirms that the only way to prevent a flash of unauthorized content is to redirect on the server-side, and returning null for access control is not considered best practice for authorization flows.

---

Add feedback or redirect for unauthorized users on the security route.

The guard correctly implements the license requirement check. However, returning null will likely cause a flicker of authenticated content, and conceptually you should prevent rendering this component at all until the auth logic has run. Consider one of these approaches:

1. Use useRouter().push() to redirect unauthorized users to a dashboard or home page
2. Show a loading spinner while permissions are validated, then redirect if unauthorized
3. Render an "Access Denied" message instead of a blank page
4. Implement server-side route protection via middleware to prevent client-side rendering entirely

Additionally, verify that server-side validation exists for this route to prevent bypassing client-side checks.