More precisely document the performance impact of to-one associations towards inheritance hierarchies#10539
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@SanderBoelaars does this currently take one extra database query for every single row that is hydrated? |
Contributor
Author
|
@greg0ire A small documentation update, maybe something you could review? |
greg0ire
reviewed
Mar 8, 2023
… towards inheritance hierarchies This puts the remarks that apply to both JTI/STI in a common section at the beginning, and tries to explain a bit more in detail why it is that way. It was sparked off by the discussion in doctrine#10538.
3692b91 to
7c2adde
Compare
greg0ire
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2023
Member
|
Thanks @mpdude ! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This puts the remarks that apply to both JTI/STI in a common section at the beginning, and tries to explain a bit more in detail why it is that way.
It was sparked off by the discussion in #10538.