Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

sbomer
Copy link
Member

@sbomer sbomer commented Apr 3, 2024

Add Azure Linux 3.0 preview images, with the same rootfs setup as the current cbl-mariner-2.0 images, using Ubuntu 16.04. We plan to introduce Ubuntu 18.04 rootfs for .NET 9 builds, so the naming scheme includes the rootfs ubuntu version (for example: azurelinux-3.0-cross-amd64-ubuntu-16.04).

This uses a naming scheme with a -net8.0 suffix. We plan to introduce .NET 9 images with a -net9.0 suffix, that use LLVM 18 and an Ubuntu 16.04 rootfs (if we can find a way to build LLVM 18 there), since we're still aiming to target 16.04 in .NET 9 per #995 (comment):

So image names will look like the following:

  • azurelinux-3.0-cross-amd64-net8.0
  • azurelinux-3.0-cross-amd64-net9.0

@richlander
Copy link
Member

We plan to introduce Ubuntu 18.04

We should hold off on that one. That was the original thinking. I think we've concluded that we'll stay the course on 16.04 for at least another release, if not two. We got feedback that made us pause on this one.

@jkotas

@mthalman
Copy link
Member

mthalman commented Apr 4, 2024

@lbussell - Be aware of the new pipelines in this PR that will need to be wired up.

@lbussell
Copy link
Contributor

lbussell commented Apr 4, 2024

@lbussell - Be aware of the new pipelines in this PR that will need to be wired up.

@mthalman, it seems like the PR validation did run on this PR, so we should merge this and then set up the public and internal pipelines afterwards, right? So that the file is present to create the pipeline against.

@mthalman
Copy link
Member

mthalman commented Apr 4, 2024

@lbussell - Be aware of the new pipelines in this PR that will need to be wired up.

@mthalman, it seems like the PR validation did run on this PR, so we should merge this and then set up the public and internal pipelines afterwards, right? So that the file is present to create the pipeline against.

Yep, exactly

@sbomer sbomer marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2024 20:49
@sbomer sbomer requested review from mthalman and jkoritzinsky April 5, 2024 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants