Improve Math.BigMul to fix Decimal compare perf regression #115182
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Improve the worst case performance of Math.BigMul which will hopefully resolve #112432 (regression i Decimal comparision)
This also allows Math.BigMul to do partial constant propagation (of the low part)
The regression seems to be caused by extra stack spilling caused by usage of MultiplyNoFlags
This PR applies the workaround suggested by @tevador in #11782 (comment) (se link for benchmarks) to Math.BigMul, which removes the extra push/pop which will hopefully restore performance.
See sharplab.io for codegen (Change BigMul2 to BigMul for code in main)
New

Main

Benchmark
Se in Bmi2.MultiplyNoFlags issues #11782 (comment)
Benchmark for orderby with and without this pr (main is commit where decimal code was merged)